[U-Boot] [PATCH] travis.yml: change Ubuntu version to xenial

[Ramon Fried]

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:41 PM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 08:24:18PM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> >
> >
> > On July 17, 2019 7:42:30 PM GMT+03:00, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:37:23PM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On July 17, 2019 4:29:04 PM GMT+03:00, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> > >wrote:
> > >> >On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:26:27AM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> trusty is getting old, move to xenial (16.04)
> > >> >> to get updated gcc and other tools.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Signed-off-by: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev at gmail.com>
> > >> >> ---
> > >> >>  .travis.yml | 2 +-
> > >> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
> > >> >> index c21bbbbca4..1640fbb6dd 100644
> > >> >> --- a/.travis.yml
> > >> >> +++ b/.travis.yml
> > >> >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> > >> >>  # build U-Boot on Travis CI - https://travis-ci.org/
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  sudo: required
> > >> >> -dist: trusty
> > >> >> +dist: xenial
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  language: c
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >Oh good, they're finally not stuck on "Trusty".  But I still think
> > >we
> > >> >need to move to GitLab CI runners instead, so we can have better
> > >> >control
> > >> >over (and provide resources for) running the builds instead.
> > >> This can be an intermediate state until movement to gitlab CI is
> > >complete.
> > >> Thanks, Ramon
> > >
> > >What's the case where things aren't working, today, that xenial fixes?
> > >And please note that the GitLab CI move is underway (I posted
> > >translating .travis.yml to .gitlab-ci.yml a while ago, now that the
> > >merge window is open I need to apply it, the current new travis stuff,
> > >and update it again).
> > host compilation with a more recent gcc compiler (5.4). instead of (4.8).
> > newer supporting packages.
>
> One other concern I have here (so please v2) is that we aren't updating
> the section to grab a "xenial" LLVM toolchain, just trusty still.
> Thanks!

I thought we dropped this altogether because of the move to gitlab.
Aren't we ?
Thanks,
Ramon.
>
> --
> Tom