[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] NXP LS1021A-TSN Board

[Prabhakar Kushwaha]

Dear Joe,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 12:26 AM
> To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
> Cc: Joseph Hershberger <joseph.hershberger at ni.com>; Prabhakar
> Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>; u-boot <u-
> boot at lists.denx.de>; Joseph Hershberger <joseph.hershberger at ni.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/9] NXP LS1021A-TSN Board
> 
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:38, Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at ni.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:08 AM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Joe,
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 03:15, Joe Hershberger
> <joe.hershberger at ni.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patchset adds initial support for the NXP LS1021A-TSN
> > > > > > board, an evaluation platform built in partnership with
> > > > > > VVDN/Argonboards for some IEEE 802.1 TSN features.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It features a cleaned-up U-Boot board support taken from
> > > > > > OpenIL, as well as an eTSEC migration to DM_ETH.  I picked up
> > > > > > Bin Meng's patch that converts the LS1021A-TWR (different board,
> same SoC):
> > > > > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2
> > > > > > F%2Flists.denx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2018-
> May%2F330096.htm
> > > > > >
> l&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.com%7Cb56d806fd1
> > > > > >
> d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> > > > > >
> 7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=p3knnJglauV7ddeHwXZqFHJTTVk
> > > > > > vgIPINUzuVkH6e%2Fw%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > > verified it on the LS1021A-TSN board I am submitting, and made
> > > > > > a few adjustments where necessary.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TODO items:
> > > > > > - Make the eTSEC driver support fixed-link interfaces (necessary
> > > > > >   for the enet2 <-> sja1105 internal port)
> > > > > > - Add driver for SJA1105 switch
> > > > > > - Potentially migrate the eTSEC MDIO bus driver to DM_MDIO and
> > > > > >   expose the TBI PHY to mdio commands (useful for debugging),
> > > > > >   once
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.d
> enx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2019-
> June%2F371563.html&data=02%7C01%7Cprabhakar.kushwaha%40nxp.c
> om%7Cb56d806fd1d34b1e9f6e08d710689b30%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c
> 5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636995913790933089&sdata=dRUz6o%2FbaaRV
> Fy%2FTn4Qxx%2B%2Bbng2YmxMVWtUyknP2qHY%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > >   is merged.
> > > > >
> > > > > This series is merged at this point... are you wanting to do
> > > > > that migration now or do it sometime later?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think I would rather have these 9 patches merged first, now that
> > > > they got reviewed, instead of reworking them again.
> > >
> > > Sounds good.
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Joe
> > >
> >
> > What does this mean, that we are waiting for Prabhakar's OK? Is the
> > patchset going to get in through a single tree? Whose is it going to
> > be?
> 
> Since the vast majority of the series is the Ethernet changes, I was planning
> to take it.
> 

I hope you have taken this patch-set

--pk