[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] dm: pcie_fsl: Fix workaround of P4080 erratum A003

Z.q. Hou zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com
Fri Aug 23 14:59:21 UTC 2019


Hi Bin,

Thanks a lot for your comments!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
> Sent: 2019年8月23日 11:15
> To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] dm: pcie_fsl: Fix workaround of P4080
> erratum A003
> 
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 10:43 AM Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bin,
> >
> > Sorry for my delay respond, and thanks for your comments!
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: 2019年7月23日 21:04
> > > To: Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang.hou at nxp.com>
> > > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Prabhakar Kushwaha
> > > <prabhakar.kushwaha at nxp.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] dm: pcie_fsl: Fix workaround of
> > > P4080 erratum A003
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:53 PM Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou at nxp.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In the workaround of P4080 erratum A003, it uses the macro
> > > > CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_ADDR to get the SerDes block
> > > > register address, the CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_ADDR is
> > > > defined as
> > > > following:
> > > >
> > > > #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_ADDR \
> > > >         (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
> > > CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_OFFSET)
> > > >
> > > > This is valid on P4080, but on non-corenet platforms, such as
> > > > MPC8548, there is not definition of
> > > > CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_OFFSET, then on these platforms
> the following build error will come up:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.c: In function 'fsl_pcie_init_port':
> > > > ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_85xx.h:3000:21: error:
> > > > 'CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_OFFSET' undeclared (first use in
> > > > this function); did you mean
> 'CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_ADDR'?
> > > >   (CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
> CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_OFFSET)
> > > >
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou at nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.c | 2 +-
> > > >  drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.h | 6 ++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.c b/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.c index
> > > > bfb207e..999e9c9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.c
> > > > @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static int fsl_pcie_init_port(struct fsl_pcie *pcie)
> > > >             !fsl_pcie_link_up(pcie)) {
> > > >                 serdes_corenet_t *srds_regs;
> > > >
> > > > -               srds_regs = (void
> > > *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_ADDR;
> > > > +               srds_regs = (void *)P4080_SERDES_ADDR;
> > > >                 val_32 = in_be32(&srds_regs->srdspccr0);
> > > >
> > > >                 if ((val_32 >> 28) == 3) { diff --git
> > > > a/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.h b/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.h index
> > > > ce2b1af..e09099b 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie_fsl.h
> > > > @@ -41,6 +41,12 @@
> > > >  #define LTSSM_L0_REV3                  0x11
> > > >  #define LTSSM_L0                       0x16
> > > >
> > > > +#ifdef ARCH_P4080
> > > > +#define P4080_SERDES_ADDR
> > > CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_SERDES_ADDR
> > > > +#else
> > > > +#define P4080_SERDES_ADDR              0
> > >
> > > So for non-P4080 platform, we are accessing address at zero?
> >
> > This macro is only used in the workaround of P4080 Erratum A003, so for
> non-P4080, it won't run into this workaround.
> >
> 
> Still don't get it. Then why not use #ifdef P4080_Erratum_A003 #endif ?

Make sense, will change in v2.

Thanks,
Zhiqiang

> 
> Regards,
> Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list