[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] arm: socfpga: Convert reset manager from struct to defines

Ley Foon Tan lftan.linux at gmail.com
Mon Aug 26 07:28:45 UTC 2019


On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:56 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 8/23/19 11:52 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:23 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/23/19 10:57 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:50 AM Ley Foon Tan <lftan.linux at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 5:50 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 8/20/19 4:35 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> >>>>>> Convert reset manager for Gen5, Arria 10 and Stratix 10 from struct
> >>>>>> to defines.
> >>>>>> No functional change.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan at intel.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>  .../mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h | 12 +++++
> >>>>>>  .../include/mach/reset_manager_arria10.h      | 41 +++-------------
> >>>>>>  .../include/mach/reset_manager_gen5.h         | 20 +++-----
> >>>>>>  .../include/mach/reset_manager_s10.h          | 33 ++-----------
> >>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/misc_gen5.c             |  6 +--
> >>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_arria10.c | 49 +++++++++----------
> >>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_gen5.c    | 26 +++++-----
> >>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/reset_manager_s10.c     | 35 ++++++-------
> >>>>>>  drivers/sysreset/sysreset_socfpga.c           |  6 +--
> >>>>>>  9 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h
> >>>>>> index 6ad037e325..c460e89d22 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/include/mach/reset_manager.h
> >>>>>> @@ -6,6 +6,18 @@
> >>>>>>  #ifndef _RESET_MANAGER_H_
> >>>>>>  #define _RESET_MANAGER_H_
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +#define RSTMGR_READL(reg)                    \
> >>>>>> +     readl(SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_ADDRESS + (reg))
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +#define RSTMGR_WRITEL(data, reg)             \
> >>>>>> +     writel(data, SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_ADDRESS + (reg))
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +#define RSTMGR_CLRBITS(reg, mask)            \
> >>>>>> +     clrbits_le32(SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_ADDRESS + (reg), mask)
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +#define RSTMGR_SETBITS(reg, mask)            \
> >>>>>> +     setbits_le32(SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_ADDRESS + (reg), mask)
> >>
> >> btw. mask is missing parenthesis, but see below.
> >>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No, don't introduce such macros. Use readl()/writel()/... in the driver.
> >>>>> The address should come from DT. Besides, there is no type checking in
> >>>>> such macros.
> >>>> These macros call to writel() and readl() underlying, it just add base
> >>>> address to it.
> >>
> >> Right, it just makes the code hardware to read and understand.
> > Okay, will change it.
>
> It should be easy to do:
> $ sed "s at RSTMGR_SETBITS(\([^,]\+\),
> \([^)]\+\))@setbits_le32(SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_ADDRESS + \1, \1)@"
> $ git add -u ; git commit -sm part1
> $ checkpatch -f --fix --fix-inplace <file>
> $ git diff # review the fixes
> $ git add -u ; git commit --amend #
>
> >>>> So, it should have type checking as call writel()/readl() directly?
> >>
> >> The functions in the macro get typechecked. But unlike function
> >> arguments, macro arguments are not checked.
> > Noted.
> >>
> >>>> If want to use address from DT, we need get address every time need to
> >>>> use the address.
> >>>> For non-DM, it is easier to use constant address. Let me know if you
> >>>> still prefer to use address from DT.
> >>
> >> Surely you can cache the address or even better, convert to DM/DT ?
> > Will try to cache the address for now.  But, we need get address from
> > DT twice, one in SPL, one in Uboot. They not sharing global data.
>
> I don't think there's much we can do about that, unless we can somehow
> share parsed live DT from SPL to U-Boot, but that's for another
> discussion/patchset/etc.
>
> > There is plan to convert clock drivers to DM. But, not in this patchset.
>
> Isn't Simon working on that already ?
Our plan is convert S10 clock driver, Simon is working on this?

Regards
Ley Foon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list