[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] drivers: pci: add map_bar support for Enhanced Allocation
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Sun Jun 2 13:15:57 UTC 2019
+Simon,
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 12:26 AM Alex Marginean <alexm.osslist at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Makes dm_pci_map_bar function available for integrated PCI devices that
> support Enhanced Allocation instead of original PCI BAR mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Marginean <alexm.osslist at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/pci.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c b/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c
> index cf1e7617ae..3204f156c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c
> @@ -1341,11 +1341,58 @@ pci_addr_t dm_pci_phys_to_bus(struct udevice *dev, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> return bus_addr;
> }
>
> +static void *dm_pci_map_ea_bar(struct udevice *dev, int bar, int flags)
> +{
> + int ea_off, ea_cnt, i, entry_size = 0;
nits: no need to initialize entry_size here.
> + int bar_id = bar - PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0;
This does not work for anything other than BAR0. It should be (bar -
PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0) >> 2;
> + u32 ea_entry;
> + u64 addr;
This should be: pci_addr_t addr
> +
> + /* handle PCI functions that use Enhanced Allocation */
> + ea_off = dm_pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EA);
> +
> + if (!ea_off)
> + return 0;
Above codes are not necessary. EA offset is already known when calling
dm_pci_map_ea_bar() from dm_pci_map_bar(). We can pass the offset to
this function.
> +
> + /* EA capability structure header */
> + dm_pci_read_config32(dev, ea_off, &ea_entry);
> + ea_cnt = (ea_entry >> 16) & 0x3f;
Avoid using magic numbers, instead use a macro PCI_EA_NUM_ENT_MASK. In
fact, Linux has several macros for EA capability
(include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h) and we can just import these macros in
U-Boot too.
> + ea_off += 4;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ea_cnt; i++, ea_off += entry_size) {
nits: two spaces before entry_size
> + /* Entry header */
> + dm_pci_read_config32(dev, ea_off, &ea_entry);
> + entry_size = (ea_entry & 0x7) * 4;
Per the spec, entry size is number of DW following the initial DW in
this entry. So it should really be: ((ea_entry & 0x7) + 1) * 4. Again
like the bar_id comments above, we can use << 2 here instead of * 4.
> +
> + if (((ea_entry >> 4) & 0xf) != bar_id)
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Base address, 1st DW */
> + dm_pci_read_config32(dev, ea_off + 4, &ea_entry);
> + addr = ea_entry & ~0x3;
> + if (ea_entry & 0x2) {
> + dm_pci_read_config32(dev, ea_off + 12, &ea_entry);
> + addr |= (u64)ea_entry << 32;
> + }
> +
> + /* size ignored for now */
> + return map_physmem(addr, flags, 0);
> + }
nits: should have one blank line here
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void *dm_pci_map_bar(struct udevice *dev, int bar, int flags)
> {
> pci_addr_t pci_bus_addr;
> u32 bar_response;
>
> + /*
> + * if the function supports Enhanced Allocation use that instead of
> + * BARs
> + */
> + if (dm_pci_find_capability(dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EA))
> + return dm_pci_map_ea_bar(dev, bar, flags);
> +
> /* read BAR address */
> dm_pci_read_config32(dev, bar, &bar_response);
> pci_bus_addr = (pci_addr_t)(bar_response & ~0xf);
> diff --git a/include/pci.h b/include/pci.h
> index 508f7bca81..e1528bb257 100644
> --- a/include/pci.h
> +++ b/include/pci.h
> @@ -1314,7 +1314,7 @@ pci_addr_t dm_pci_phys_to_bus(struct udevice *dev, phys_addr_t addr,
> * @dev: Device to check
> * @bar: Bar number to read (numbered from 0)
This one is confusing. It it not bar number (0/1/...), but bar
register offset. Suggest a separate patch to correct it. And this
function seems to only handle BAR0-BAR0 for header type 0. Please also
comment that.
> * @flags: Flags for the region type (PCI_REGION_...)
> - * @return: pointer to the virtual address to use
> + * @return: pointer to the virtual address to use or 0 on error
This should be separate patch to correct the comments. Together with
the bar comments above.
> */
> void *dm_pci_map_bar(struct udevice *dev, int bar, int flags);
Please create test cases in test/dm/pci.c to cover the EA capability
test. Especially since there are some bugs in the for loop in
dm_pci_map_ea_bar(), we should create case to get something like BAR3
instead of BAR0. I suspect why you did not see the issue was because
you only covered the BAR0 hence only one iteration of the for loop was
executed.
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list