[U-Boot] [PATCH] clk: sifive: fu540-prci: align primary DT match string to the DT bindings

[Bin Meng]

Hi Paul,

On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 1:45 PM Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley at sifive.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Bin,
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2019, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 May 2019, Bin Meng wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 5:13 PM Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley at sifive.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > > index 2d47ebc6b1..d79d1a5351 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sifive/fu540-prci.c
> > > > @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static struct clk_ops sifive_fu540_prci_ops = {
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  static const struct udevice_id sifive_fu540_prci_ids[] = {
> > > > -       { .compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-prci0" },
> > > > +       { .compatible = "sifive,fu540-c000-prci" },
> > >
> > > Can we keep the previous compatible string for compatibility reason?
> > > U-Boot is now reusing the DT that FSBL passes.
> >
> > Are there any FSBLs that pass "sifive,fu540-c000-prci0" ?  I am not aware
> > of any.
> >
> > SiFive FSBLs have only ever used "sifive,aloeprci0" (or
> > "sifive,ux00prci0") and those will soon be deprecated.
>
> Just checking in again on this patch.  Do you still need
> "sifive,fu540-c000-prci0" to be preserved, even though it should be
> unused?  Or is the original patch OK for you?

The original patch looks OK to me.
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>

Regards,
Bin