[U-Boot] [RFC 3/3] lib: rsa: add rsa_verify_with_pkey()
AKASHI Takahiro
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Thu Oct 3 05:48:13 UTC 2019
Simon,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:03:25PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Overall, do you agree to my approach here?
Ping. Do you mind my sending out v2?
-Takahiro Akashi
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 10:48:07PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi AKASHI,
> >
> > On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 00:06, AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This function, and hence rsa_verify(), will perform RSA verification
> > > with two essential parameters for a RSA public key in contract of
> > > rsa_verify_with_keynode(), which requires additional three parameters
> > > stored in FIT image.
> > >
> > > It will be used in implementing UEFI secure boot, i.e. image authentication
> > > and variable authentication.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > lib/rsa/Kconfig | 7 +++++
> > > lib/rsa/Makefile | 3 ++-
> > > lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > > 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/rsa/Kconfig b/lib/rsa/Kconfig
> > > index 338c8124da59..3c1986a26f8c 100644
> > > --- a/lib/rsa/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/lib/rsa/Kconfig
> > > @@ -25,6 +25,13 @@ config RSA_VERIFY
> > > help
> > > Add RSA signature verification support.
> > >
> > > +config RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY
> > > + bool "Execute RSA verification without key parameters from FDT"
> > > + depends on RSA
> > > + help
> > > + This options enables RSA signature verification without
> > > + using public key parameters which is embedded control FDT.
> >
> > Please expand this, a lot. It is too brief.
>
> Will add more description.
>
> > > +
> > > config RSA_SOFTWARE_EXP
> > > bool "Enable driver for RSA Modular Exponentiation in software"
> > > depends on DM
> > > diff --git a/lib/rsa/Makefile b/lib/rsa/Makefile
> > > index d66eef74c514..fd4592fd6a8a 100644
> > > --- a/lib/rsa/Makefile
> > > +++ b/lib/rsa/Makefile
> > > @@ -5,5 +5,6 @@
> > > # (C) Copyright 2000-2007
> > > # Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, wd at denx.de.
> > >
> > > -obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o rsa-keyprop.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY) += rsa-verify.o rsa-checksum.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) += rsa-keyprop.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_RSA_SOFTWARE_EXP) += rsa-mod-exp.o
> > > diff --git a/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c b/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c
> > > index 287fcc4d234d..80eabff3e940 100644
> > > --- a/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c
> > > +++ b/lib/rsa/rsa-verify.c
> > > @@ -17,9 +17,14 @@
> > > #include "mkimage.h"
> > > #include <fdt_support.h>
> > > #endif
> > > +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> > > #include <u-boot/rsa-mod-exp.h>
> > > #include <u-boot/rsa.h>
> > >
> > > +#ifndef __UBOOT__ /* for host tools */
> > > +#undef CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > /* Default public exponent for backward compatibility */
> > > #define RSA_DEFAULT_PUBEXP 65537
> > >
> > > @@ -342,6 +347,34 @@ static int rsa_verify_key(struct image_sign_info *info,
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY
> > > +/**
> > > + * rsa_verify_with_pkey()
> > > + *
> > > + */
> > > +static int rsa_verify_with_pkey(struct image_sign_info *info,
> > > + const void *hash, uint8_t *sig, uint sig_len)
> > > +{
> > > + struct key_prop *prop;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + /* Public key is self-described to fill key_prop */
> > > + prop = rsa_gen_key_prop(info->key, info->keylen);
> > > + if (!prop) {
> > > + debug("Generating necessary parameter for decoding failed\n");
> > > + return -EACCES;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = rsa_verify_key(info, prop, sig, sig_len, hash,
> > > + info->crypto->key_len);
> > > +
> > > + rsa_free_key_prop(prop);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT_SIGNATURE)
> > > /**
> > > * rsa_verify_with_keynode() - Verify a signature against some data using
> > > * information in node with prperties of RSA Key like modulus, exponent etc.
> > > @@ -395,18 +428,21 @@ static int rsa_verify_with_keynode(struct image_sign_info *info,
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > int rsa_verify(struct image_sign_info *info,
> > > const struct image_region region[], int region_count,
> > > uint8_t *sig, uint sig_len)
> > > {
> > > - const void *blob = info->fdt_blob;
> > > /* Reserve memory for maximum checksum-length */
> > > uint8_t hash[info->crypto->key_len];
> > > + int ret = -EACCES;
> > > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT_SIGNATURE)
> > > + const void *blob = info->fdt_blob;
> > > int ndepth, noffset;
> > > int sig_node, node;
> > > char name[100];
> > > - int ret;
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Verify that the checksum-length does not exceed the
> > > @@ -419,12 +455,6 @@ int rsa_verify(struct image_sign_info *info,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - sig_node = fdt_subnode_offset(blob, 0, FIT_SIG_NODENAME);
> > > - if (sig_node < 0) {
> > > - debug("%s: No signature node found\n", __func__);
> > > - return -ENOENT;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > /* Calculate checksum with checksum-algorithm */
> > > ret = info->checksum->calculate(info->checksum->name,
> > > region, region_count, hash);
> > > @@ -433,6 +463,22 @@ int rsa_verify(struct image_sign_info *info,
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY
> >
> > Can this use if() instead of #ifdef?
>
> Do you mean
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RSA_VERIFY_WITH_PKEY) && !info->fdt_blob) ?
>
> > > + if (!info->fdt_blob) {
> > > + /* don't rely on fdt properties */
> > > + ret = rsa_verify_with_pkey(info, hash, sig, sig_len);
> >
> > Does this support required_keynode?
>
> IICU, no because required_keynode is an offset into fdt.
>
> > Please add to the documentation for secure boot in uImage, as this
> > seems to be a new case.
>
> It may work with FIT in case of no extra key parameters,
> I intended that the feature is used only by UEFI.
> So I don't think it appropriate to add a doc under doc/uImage.FIT.
>
> > Also, how do we test this new code?
>
> The code is exercised and tested only through UEFI's verification code
> and relevant pytest (in my secure boot patch[1]). Like test_vboot?
>
> [1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-September/383897.html
>
> Thanks,
> -Takahiro Akashi
>
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FIT_SIGNATURE)
> > > + sig_node = fdt_subnode_offset(blob, 0, FIT_SIG_NODENAME);
> > > + if (sig_node < 0) {
> > > + debug("%s: No signature node found\n", __func__);
> > > + return -ENOENT;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > /* See if we must use a particular key */
> > > if (info->required_keynode != -1) {
> > > ret = rsa_verify_with_keynode(info, hash, sig, sig_len,
> > > @@ -459,6 +505,7 @@ int rsa_verify(struct image_sign_info *info,
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.21.0
> > >
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list