[U-Boot] [PATCH 041/126] iod: Enhance to support display of multiple values
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Mon Oct 7 01:00:11 UTC 2019
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 11:18 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:58 PM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > At present the 'iod' command differs from 'md' in that it only shows a
> > single value. It is useful to see a dump of multiple values, particularly
> > when x86 peripherals contain register sets accessible via I/O ports.
> >
> > Enhance the command to match md.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> > cmd/io.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cmd/io.c b/cmd/io.c
> > index 79faf814ff7..2021a44b10f 100644
> > --- a/cmd/io.c
> > +++ b/cmd/io.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,15 @@
> > #include <command.h>
> > #include <asm/io.h>
> >
> > +/* Display values from last command.
>
> nits: wrong multi-line comment format
>
> > + * Memory modify remembered values are different from display memory.
>
> This comment does not apply as there is no "memory modify" in this context.
>
> > + */
> > +static ulong last_addr, last_size;
> > +static ulong last_length = 0x40;
> > +static ulong base_address;
> > +
> > +#define DISP_LINE_LEN 16
> > +
> > /*
> > * IO Display
> > *
> > @@ -19,26 +28,63 @@
> > */
> > int do_io_iod(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const argv[])
> > {
> > - ulong addr;
> > - int size;
> > -
> > - if (argc != 2)
> > + ulong addr, length, bytes;
> > + u8 buf[DISP_LINE_LEN];
> > + int size, todo;
> > +
> > + /* We use the last specified parameters, unless new ones are
>
> nits: wrong multi-line comment format
>
> > + * entered.
> > + */
> > + addr = last_addr;
> > + size = last_size;
> > + length = last_length;
> > +
> > + if (argc < 2)
> > return CMD_RET_USAGE;
> >
> > - size = cmd_get_data_size(argv[0], 4);
> > - if (size < 0)
> > - return 1;
> > -
> > - addr = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 16);
> > -
> > - printf("%04x: ", (u16) addr);
> > -
> > - if (size == 4)
> > - printf("%08x\n", inl(addr));
> > - else if (size == 2)
> > - printf("%04x\n", inw(addr));
> > - else
> > - printf("%02x\n", inb(addr));
> > + if ((flag & CMD_FLAG_REPEAT) == 0) {
> > + /* New command specified. Check for a size specification.
>
> nits: wrong multi-line comment format
>
> > + * Defaults to long if no or incorrect specification.
> > + */
> > + size = cmd_get_data_size(argv[0], 4);
> > + if (size < 0)
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > + /* Address is specified since argc > 1 */
> > + addr = simple_strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 16);
> > + addr += base_address;
> > +
> > + /* If another parameter, it is the length to display.
>
> nits: wrong multi-line comment format
Corrected these wrong multi-line comment format, and
>
> > + * Length is the number of objects, not number of bytes.
> > + */
> > + if (argc > 2)
> > + length = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL, 16);
> > + }
> > +
> > + bytes = size * length;
> > +
> > + /* Print the lines */
> > + for (; bytes > 0; addr += todo) {
> > + u8 *ptr = buf;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + todo = min(bytes, (ulong)DISP_LINE_LEN);
> > + for (i = 0; i < todo; i += size, ptr += size) {
> > + if (size == 4)
> > + *(u32 *)ptr = inl(addr + i);
> > + else if (size == 2)
> > + *(u16 *)ptr = inw(addr + i);
> > + else
> > + *ptr = inb(addr + i);
> > + }
> > + print_buffer(addr, buf, size, todo / size,
> > + DISP_LINE_LEN / size);
> > + bytes -= todo;
> > + }
> > +
> > + last_addr = addr;
> > + last_length = length;
> > + last_size = size;
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -69,7 +115,7 @@ int do_io_iow(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *const argv[])
> > }
> >
> > /**************************************************/
> > -U_BOOT_CMD(iod, 2, 0, do_io_iod,
> > +U_BOOT_CMD(iod, 3, 1, do_io_iod,
> > "IO space display", "[.b, .w, .l] address");
> >
> > U_BOOT_CMD(iow, 3, 0, do_io_iow,
> > --
>
> Other than above issues,
>
> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
applied to u-boot-x86/next, thanks!
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list