[U-Boot] [PATCH 050/126] x86: timer: Reduce timer code size in TPL on Intel CPUs
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Sat Oct 12 05:18:28 UTC 2019
Hi Simon,
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 11:38 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Bin,
>
> On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 07:19, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 1:06 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bin,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 08:36, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Simon,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:58 PM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Most of the timer-calibration methods are not needed on recent Intel CPUs
> > > > > and just increase code size. Add an option to use the known-good way to
> > > > > get the clock frequency in TPL. Size reduction is about 700 bytes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > drivers/timer/Kconfig | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> > > > > drivers/timer/tsc_timer.c | 7 +++++--
> > > > > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/timer/Kconfig b/drivers/timer/Kconfig
> > > > > index 5f4bc6edb67..90bc8ec7c53 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/timer/Kconfig
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/timer/Kconfig
> > > > > @@ -117,16 +117,6 @@ config RENESAS_OSTM_TIMER
> > > > > Enables support for the Renesas OSTM Timer driver.
> > > > > This timer is present on Renesas RZ/A1 R7S72100 SoCs.
> > > > >
> > > > > -config X86_TSC_TIMER_EARLY_FREQ
> > > > > - int "x86 TSC timer frequency in MHz when used as the early timer"
> > > > > - depends on X86_TSC_TIMER
> > > > > - default 1000
> > > > > - help
> > > > > - Sets the estimated CPU frequency in MHz when TSC is used as the
> > > > > - early timer and the frequency can neither be calibrated via some
> > > > > - hardware ways, nor got from device tree at the time when device
> > > > > - tree is not available yet.
> > > > > -
> > > > > config OMAP_TIMER
> > > > > bool "Omap timer support"
> > > > > depends on TIMER
> > > > > @@ -174,6 +164,25 @@ config X86_TSC_TIMER
> > > > > help
> > > > > Select this to enable Time-Stamp Counter (TSC) timer for x86.
> > > > >
> > > > > +config X86_TSC_TIMER_EARLY_FREQ
> > > > > + int "x86 TSC timer frequency in MHz when used as the early timer"
> > > > > + depends on X86_TSC_TIMER
> > > > > + default 1000
> > > > > + help
> > > > > + Sets the estimated CPU frequency in MHz when TSC is used as the
> > > > > + early timer and the frequency can neither be calibrated via some
> > > > > + hardware ways, nor got from device tree at the time when device
> > > > > + tree is not available yet.
> > > > > +
> > > > > +config TPL_X86_TSC_TIMER_NATIVE
> > > > > + bool "x86 TSC timer uses native calibration"
> > > > > + depends on TPL && X86_TSC_TIMER
> > > > > + help
> > > > > + Selects native timer calibration for TPL and don't include the other
> > > > > + methods in the code. This helps to reduce code size in TPL and works
> > > > > + on fairly modern Intel chips. Code-size reductions is about 700
> > > > > + bytes.
> > > > > +
> > > > > config MTK_TIMER
> > > > > bool "MediaTek timer support"
> > > > > depends on TIMER
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/timer/tsc_timer.c b/drivers/timer/tsc_timer.c
> > > > > index 919caba8a14..9630036bc7f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/timer/tsc_timer.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/timer/tsc_timer.c
> > > > > @@ -49,8 +49,7 @@ static unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
> > > > > return 0;
> > > > >
> > > > > crystal_freq = tsc_info.ecx / 1000;
> > > > > -
> > > > > - if (!crystal_freq) {
> > > > > + if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(X86_TSC_TIMER_NATIVE) && !crystal_freq) {
> > > > > switch (gd->arch.x86_model) {
> > > > > case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE:
> > > > > case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP:
> > > > > @@ -405,6 +404,10 @@ static void tsc_timer_ensure_setup(bool early)
> > > > > if (fast_calibrate)
> > > > > goto done;
> > > > >
> > > > > + /* Reduce code size by dropping other methods */
> > > > > + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(X86_TSC_TIMER_NATIVE))
> > > > > + panic("no timer");
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > I don't get it. How could this reduce the code size? I don't see any
> > > > #ifdefs around the other methods we want to drop?
> > >
> > > The compiler sees that CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(..) is 1, and leaves out the
> > > code that follows it.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > if (1)
> > panic("no timer");
> >
> > then compiler does not generate any codes of the following?
> >
> > fast_calibrate = cpu_mhz_from_cpuid();
> >
> > I don't understand.
> >
>
> The panic() function is marked as noreturn, so the compiler assume it
> doesn't return. You can try this if you like. It reduces the size by
> 700 bytes which on a 22KB image is a lot.
OK, compiler is smart to generate less codes :)
But the way you added the CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(..) logic check here is
obscure if one does not dig into that deep ..
>
> > Besides, I think adding some random Kconfig options to exclude some
> > specific parts in one C file is a bad idea. It's unclear to me why we
> > should exclude one part versus another part. I'm OK to exclude the
> > whole C file for TPL/SPL though, but not part of it for size
> > limitation purpose.
>
> My understanding is the most of the code in this function is a
> fallback in case an earlier method doesn't work. But on modern CPUs
Yes, correct.
> the first method always works, so this is a waste of time?
>
It's not a wast of time, but a bloat of the code size. As you said,
these are fallbacks, and methods are prioritized based on the age of
the processors, so that native method is tried first, followed by
cpuid, MSR, and finally PIT.
You also mentioned that "on modern CPUs the first method always
works", so today the first method is native_calibrate_tsc(), but say 3
years later, this might not be true, and chances are that we may add
another method before native_calibrate_tsc() for whatever mechanism is
used on the latest processors, and the insertion of the TPL Kconfig
option (TPL_X86_TSC_TIMER_NATIVE) check today is not future proof.
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list