[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 02/11] include: time.h: define time64_t

[Heinrich Schuchardt]

On 10/11/19 9:41 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Adding time64_t definition will help improve portability of linux kernel
> code (in my case, lib/crypto/x509_cert_parser.c).
>
> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> ---
>   include/linux/time.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/time.h b/include/linux/time.h
> index b8d298eb4d68..6186985856d7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/time.h
> +++ b/include/linux/time.h
> @@ -150,4 +150,28 @@ _DEFUN (ctime_r, (tim_p, result),
>       return asctime_r (localtime_r (tim_p, &tm), result);
>   }
>
> +/* from <linux>/kernel/time/time.c */
> +typedef __s64 time64_t;

Wouldn't we want to put these definitions into a file
include/linux/time64.h?

> +
> +inline time64_t mktime64(const unsigned int year0, const unsigned int mon0,
> +			 const unsigned int day, const unsigned int hour,
> +			 const unsigned int min, const unsigned int sec)


Where is the function description?

The Linux kernel does not make this function an inline function. Why
should we inline it in U-Boot?

> +{
> +	unsigned int mon = mon0, year = year0;
> +
> +	/* 1..12 -> 11,12,1..10 */
> +	mon -= 2;
> +	if (0 >= (int)mon) {
> +		mon += 12;	/* Puts Feb last since it has leap day */
> +		year -= 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ((((time64_t)
> +		  (year / 4 - year / 100 + year / 400 + 367 * mon / 12 + day) +
> +		  year * 365 - 719499
> +	  ) * 24 + hour /* now have hours - midnight tomorrow handled here */
> +	  ) * 60 + min /* now have minutes */
> +	) * 60 + sec; /* finally seconds */

This code is duplicate to rtc_mktime().

Duplication could be avoided by letting rtc_mktime() call mktime64().

Best regards

Heinrich

> +}
> +
>   #endif
>