[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 00/11] import x509/pkcs7 parsers from linux
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Tue Oct 15 09:25:19 UTC 2019
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:33:18AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/15/19 5:18 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:02:09PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >>On 10/11/19 9:55 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>>I hope this patch set will be reviewed promptly as I'm aiming to
> >>>push my "UEFI secure boot" patch for v2020.01.
> >>How can I make all of these new files being built to check for build
> >As always in my case of UEFI secure boot, they have gone through build and
> >run/tests as part of UEFI secure boot. This is also true for RSA
> >extension as UEFI secure boot is the only user of those features.
> Did you run them through Travis?
As far as this patch set is concerned, no configuration enables
any of kconfig options listed below and running Travis doesn't make sense.
> >Please note that almost of all the code here come from the latest
> >linux code without any changes. A few changes that I made are
> >quite U-Boot/UEFI-secure-boot specific and is *best* tested through
> >UEFI secure boot test.
> >That said, you can at least build the code by enabling
> > Library routines
> > Security support
> > Asymmetric Key Support
> > CONFIG_ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE
> > CONFIG_X509_CERTIFICATE_PARSER
> > CONFIG_PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER
> >>Please, provide unit tests for the patch series.
> >As I said above, it will be exercised and tested under UEFI secure boot
> If there is nothing I can test now, I would not know how to evaluate
> these patches.
> There is good reason that we have unit tests and don't simply say U-Boot
> can be tested by booting Linux.
> >>Please, provide a documentation how these different tools and files work
> >What do you mean by different tools?
> >Asn1 compiler and what?
> >Do you want to have doc/README.asn1compiler?
> This patch series provides some puzzle pieces but doesn't tell me how
> they fit together. Maybe a README describing the different elements
> provided for UEFI secure boot would be most appropriate.
> Best regards
> >-Takahiro Akashi
> >>Best regards
More information about the U-Boot