[U-Boot] [PATCH v1 00/11] import x509/pkcs7 parsers from linux
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Fri Oct 18 08:36:28 UTC 2019
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:23:21AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:25:19PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 07:33:18AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 10/15/19 5:18 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > >On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 03:02:09PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > >>On 10/11/19 9:55 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > >>>I hope this patch set will be reviewed promptly as I'm aiming to
> > > >>>push my "UEFI secure boot" patch for v2020.01.
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>How can I make all of these new files being built to check for build
> > > >>warnings?
> > > >
> > > >As always in my case of UEFI secure boot, they have gone through build and
> > > >run/tests as part of UEFI secure boot. This is also true for RSA
> > > >extension as UEFI secure boot is the only user of those features.
> > >
> > > Did you run them through Travis?
> > As far as this patch set is concerned, no configuration enables
> > any of kconfig options listed below and running Travis doesn't make sense.
> That's a problem that needs to be fixed. I am not OK with the idea of
> adding a new feature that will not be put through our CI and so when
> things break it (which will happen, inadvertently) it won't be caught
> until much later. Figuring out how to extend our CI to test this is a
> must. Thanks!
I added a simple *unit* test under "test/lib."
As I said before, however, no existing configuration enables either
and the related code won't be built or exercised in any way.
So I made a small trick to Kconfig:
=== 8< ===
bool "Unit tests for library functions"
depends on UNIT_TEST
Enables the 'ut lib' command which tests library functions like
memcat(), memcyp(), memmove().
bool "Unit test for asn1 compiler and decoder function"
Enables a test which exercises asn1 compiler and decoder function
via various parsers.
=== >8 ===
So as long as UT_LIB is enabled and run by one of Travis CI test cases,
a new test for ASN1 will also be exercised.
(I don't know which one will invoke "ut" command.)
Do you agree to this approach?
More information about the U-Boot