[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] libfdt: Allow #size-cells of 0

[sjg at google.com]

On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 22:48, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 02:49, <matthias.bgg at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
> >
> > The commit "libfdt: fdt_address_cells() and fdt_size_cells()" introduced
> > a bug as it consolidated code between the helpers for getting
> > be 0, and is frequently found so in practice for /cpus.  IEEE1275 only
> > requires implementations to handle 1..4 for #address-cells, although one
> > could make a case for #address-cells == #size-cells == 0 being used to
> > represent a bridge with a single port.
> >
> > While we're there, it's not totally obvious that the existing implicit
> > cast of a u32 to int will give the correct results according to strict C,
> > although it does work in practice.  Straighten that up to cast only after
> > we've made our range checks.
> >
> > This is based on upstream commit:
> > b8d6eca ("libfdt: Allow #size-cells of 0")
> > but misses the test cases,as we don't implement them in U-Boot.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt_addresses.c | 8 +++++---
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> This is v2 but I don't see a change log?

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>

(please use patman if you can next time)

Applied to u-boot-dm/next, thanks!