[PATCH v2 1/2] serial: ns16550: Revert "Move PCI access from ofdata_to_platdata() to probe()"

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:56 AM Ang, Chee Hong <chee.hong.ang at intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:56 AM Ang, Chee Hong <chee.hong.ang at intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 7:28 PM Ang, Chee Hong
> > > > <chee.hong.ang at intel.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:55:14PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:55 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 11:39, Andy Shevchenko
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This reverts commit
> > > > 720f9e1fdb0c92d3fd16e1bfc25bcbd35612675c.
> >
> > > > > > Adding SoCFPGA folks to this thread as the first commit
> > > > > > (82de42fa1468) is also breaking platforms there and then their
> > > > > > fix for that problem is also causing problems, if I follow right.
> > > >
> > > > > Yes. This commit (82de42fa1468) breaks our A10 platform.
> > > > > I did submit similar patch to move some init code from
> > > > > ofdata_to_platdata() to
> > > > probe() for our clock driver as well.
> > > > > Check out the thread here:
> > > > > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2020-April/405252.html
> > > >
> > > > I see half or less of the messages in the thread by above link.
> > > > Can you summarize what should have been done in order to fix this?
> > > 1) Fix in the driver (broken by this commit: 82de42fa1468) by moving some
> > code from ofdata_to_platdata() to probe().
> > > 2) Fix the DM core.
> > > Simon and Marek were discussing about these 2 options.
> > > Perhaps Simon can help shed some light here.
> >
> > I have a question. Does revert of
> > 720f9e1fdb0c92d3fd16e1bfc25bcbd35612675c makes any difference to
> > SoCFPGA?
> This commit: 82de42fa1468 break our SoCFPGA A10 clock driver.
> This commit 720f9e1fdb0c92d3fd16e1bfc25bcbd35612675c does not affect our SoCFPGA platforms.
> We just want to know which way to go. Fixing our A10 clock driver or fix the DM core.
> Seems like this commit 720f9e1fdb0c92d3fd16e1bfc25bcbd35612675c go with option 1 (fixing the driver).

I dunno what 720f9e is actually fixing, it breaks definitely the ordering.

So, I'm going to send a v3 of revert of 720f9e since it is not related
to SoCFPGA.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko