[RFC 07/14] efi_loader: capsule: add memory range capsule definitions

AKASHI Takahiro takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Mon Apr 6 09:48:00 CEST 2020


Heinrich,

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 04:57:16PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 08:35:57AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 3/18/20 2:22 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:11:43AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > On 3/17/20 3:12 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > > > Memory range capsule gives us a way to notify that some memory regions
> > > > > should be left untouched across the next reset.
> > > > > See UEFI specification, section 8.5.3.
> > > > 
> > > > There are multiple places where RAM availability is tested by writing
> > > > during board bring up. Please, describe which changes are needed in ATF
> > > > and U-Boot to make memory range capsules work reliably.
> > > 
> > > I think that they are quite system/platform-specific
> > > and that it's beyond the scope of this patch.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Takahiro Akashi
> > 
> > To me it does not make sense to merge this development if the platform
> > compatibility is not evaluated.
> 
> What do you mean by "platform compatibility?"
> Please elaborate it and specific requirements, if any,
> for better understandings.

I need your feedback to improve my code.

-Takahiro Akashi

> -Takahiro Akashi
> 
> > Best regards
> > 
> > Heinrich
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > Consider also memory encryption provided by some CPUs.
> > > > https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-mktme-amd-memory-encryption,39467.html
> > > > 
> > > > Aren't file based capsules a much more reliable way for the OS to
> > > > communicate to the firmware?
> > > > 
> > > > Best regards
> > > > 
> > > > Heinrich
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Since how we should handle this kind of capsule is totally up to
> > > > > the system, no implementation will be added in this commit.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    include/efi_api.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > >    1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/include/efi_api.h b/include/efi_api.h
> > > > > index ac2b38801c0c..b7bf21cac7ad 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/efi_api.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/efi_api.h
> > > > > @@ -221,6 +221,10 @@ enum efi_reset_type {
> > > > >    	EFI_GUID(0x39b68c46, 0xf7fb, 0x441b, 0xb6, 0xec, \
> > > > >    		 0x16, 0xb0, 0xf6, 0x98, 0x21, 0xf3)
> > > > > 
> > > > > +#define EFI_MEMORY_RANGE_CAPSULE_GUID \
> > > > > +	EFI_GUID(0xde9f0ec, 0x88b6, 0x428f, 0x97, 0x7a, \
> > > > > +		 0x25, 0x8f, 0x1d, 0xe, 0x5e, 0x72)
> > > > > +
> > > > >    struct efi_capsule_header {
> > > > >    	efi_guid_t capsule_guid;
> > > > >    	u32 header_size;
> > > > > @@ -236,6 +240,19 @@ struct efi_capsule_result_variable_header {
> > > > >    	efi_status_t capsule_status;
> > > > >    } __packed;
> > > > > 
> > > > > +struct efi_memory_range {
> > > > > +	efi_physical_addr_t	address;
> > > > > +	u64			length;
> > > > > +};
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct efi_memory_range_capsule {
> > > > > +	struct efi_capsule_header *header;
> > > > > +	/* EFI_MEMORY_TYPE: 0x80000000-0xFFFFFFFF */
> > > > > +	enum efi_mem_type os_requested_memory_type;
> > > > > +	u64 number_of_memory_ranges;
> > > > > +	struct efi_memory_range memory_ranges[];
> > > > > +} __packed;
> > > > > +
> > > > >    #define EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_TIME			0x0001
> > > > >    #define EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_SET_TIME			0x0002
> > > > >    #define EFI_RT_SUPPORTED_GET_WAKEUP_TIME		0x0004
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > 


More information about the U-Boot mailing list