[PATCH v3 1/1] phy: add support for stingray PAXB PHY controller

[Rayagonda Kokatanur]

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 7:11 PM Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:08:12PM +0530, Rayagonda Kokatanur wrote:
>
> > From: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam at broadcom.com>
> >
> > Add support for stingray PAXB PHY controller driver.
> > This driver supports maximum 8 PAXB phys using pipemux data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam at broadcom.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur at broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
> > ---
> > Changes from v2:
> >  -Address review comments from Stefan Roese,
> >   Rearrange the include files.
> >   Remove dm/device.h as its included part of dm.h.
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> >  -Address review comments from Stefan Roese,
> >   Use GENMASK() instead of hard code value.
> >   Remove unwanted struct declaration.
> >   Get pr_err() into single line.
> >
> >  drivers/phy/Kconfig           |   7 ++
> >  drivers/phy/Makefile          |   1 +
> >  drivers/phy/phy-bcm-sr-pcie.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> The patch itself is fine but I think shows another problem.  Can you
> please add a patch that lists something relevant in the top-level
> MAINTAINERS file and list this and all of the other drivers, etc, that
> wouldn't just be listed in the board MAINATINERS file?  Thanks!

I will be mainitainer going ahead.
I have a plan to update top level MAINTAINER file once I push platform files.
Hope this is fine.

>
> --
> Tom