[PATCH 0/4] Updates for ClearFog EEPROM

[Joel Johnson]

On 2020-04-16 06:38, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Baruch,
> 
> On 16.04.20 14:22, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>> 
>> On Wed, Apr 15 2020, Stefan Roese wrote:
>>> On 19.01.20 08:10, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This set of patches applies on top of 
>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
>>>> based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates in 
>>>> a
>>>> related patch series.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Joel Johnson (4):
>>>>     cmd: sys_eeprom: add missing implicit header
>>>>     cmd: sys_eeprom reflect I2C dependency in Kconfig
>>>>     arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't set SPL misc
>>>>     arm: mvebu: clearfog: fix compile w/o EEPROM
>>>> 
>>>>    board/solidrun/clearfog/clearfog.c | 26 
>>>> +++++++++++++++-----------
>>>>    cmd/Kconfig                        |  1 +
>>>>    cmd/sys_eeprom.c                   |  1 +
>>>>    configs/clearfog_defconfig         |  1 -
>>>>    4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> Is it correct to assume, that this patchset is superseded by the
>>> Baruch's work? Can it be dropped?
>> 
>> Which work are you referring to?
>> 
>> The text quoted above specifically mentions dependency on my patch
>> series adding auto detection based on EEPROM data. So as I understand
>> these patches are still useful.
>> 
>> Joel, correct me if I am wrong.
> 
> If these are still useful, then please rebase and resubmit. I've 
> dropped
> the patches in the meantime from patchwork as they didn't apply clean
> any more.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan

Dropping these are fine, it was indeed superseded.

Baruch, you'd included a reworked version of these into a later version 
of your patchset. As I recall, there were issues at the time with 
disabling EEPROM support which this, and the eventual merged version of 
your series, resolved.

Joel