[PATCH v8 00/21] riscv: Add Sipeed Maix support

[Rick Chen]

Hi Sean

> On 4/22/20 9:51 PM, Rick Chen wrote:
> > Hi Sean
> >
> >> Hi Sean
> >>
> >>> This patch series adds support for Sipeed Maix boards and the Kendryte
> >>> K210 CPU. Currently, only the Maix Bit V2.0 is supported, however other
> >>> models are similar.
> >>>
> >>> Known Bugs/Limitations:
> >>> - Accessing the AI ram hangs, limiting available ram to 6M
> >>> - Trying to boot an image with bootm fails with
> >>>   ERROR: Failed to allocate 0x7d60 bytes below 0x80000000.
> >>>
> >>> To flash u-boot to a maix bit, run
> >>> kflash -tp /dev/<your tty here> -B bit_mic u-boot-dtb.bin
> >>>
> >>> Boot output should look like the following:
> >>>
> >>> U-Boot 2020.04-rc2-00087-g2221cc09c1-dirty (Feb 28 2020 - 13:53:09 -0500)
> >>>
> >>> DRAM:  8 MiB
> >>> In:    serial at 38000000
> >>> Out:   serial at 38000000
> >>> Err:   serial at 38000000
> >>> =>
> >>>
> >>> Changes for v8:
> >>> - Removed dependency on the patch "clk: Add functions to register CCF clock
> >>>   structs". Hopefully this will make reviewing easier.
> >>
> >> I have applied this patch series to u-boot-riscv/master except [PATCH
> >> v8 14/21] riscv: Clean up IPI initialization code.
> >> Because it will cause some warnings as below:
> >>
> >> arch/riscv/lib/andes_plic.c: In function 'riscv_init_ipi':
> >> arch/riscv/lib/andes_plic.c:84:12: warning: initialization makes
> >> integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> >>   int ret = syscon_get_first_range(RISCV_SYSCON_PLIC);
> >>             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> arch/riscv/lib/andes_plic.c:86:13: warning: passing argument 1 of
> >> 'IS_ERR' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> >>   if (IS_ERR(ret))
> >>              ^~~
> >> In file included from arch/riscv/lib/andes_plic.c:20:0:
> >> include/linux/err.h:34:20: note: expected 'const void *' but argument
> >> is of type 'int'
> >>  static inline long IS_ERR(const void *ptr)
> >>                     ^~~~~~
> >> arch/riscv/lib/andes_plic.c:87:18: warning: passing argument 1 of
> >> 'PTR_ERR' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> >>    return PTR_ERR(ret);
> >>                   ^~~
> >> In file included from arch/riscv/lib/andes_plic.c:20:0:
> >> include/linux/err.h:29:20: note: expected 'const void *' but argument
> >> is of type 'int'
> >>  static inline long PTR_ERR(const void *ptr)
> >>                     ^~~~~~~
> >> arch/riscv/lib/andes_plic.c:88:16: warning: assignment makes pointer
> >> from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
> >>   gd->arch.plic = ret;
> >>
> >
> > after running CI yesterday, it failed in many cases:
> > https://travis-ci.org/github/rickchen36/u-boot-riscv/builds/678023975
> >
> > and I trace at least two cases belong to your patch
> > 49.59
> > https://travis-ci.org/github/rickchen36/u-boot-riscv/jobs/678024035
> >
> > arning, treated as error:
> > /home/travis/build/rickchen36/u-boot-riscv/doc/board/sipeed/maix.rst:173:Error
> > in "code-block" directive:
> > 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied.
> > .. code-block::
> >     &sysclk {
> >         assigned-clocks = <&sysclk K210_CLK_PLL0>;
> >         assigned-clock-rates = <800000000>;
> >     };
> > doc/Makefile:69: recipe for target 'htmldocs' failed
> > make[1]: *** [htmldocs] Error 1
>
> I used to have
>
> .. code-block:: dts
>
> but it warned that "dts" was not a valid language, so I dropped it.
>
> > 49.66
> > https://travis-ci.org/github/rickchen36/u-boot-riscv/jobs/678024042
> >
> > ./tools/patman/patman --test && ./tools/buildman/buildman -t &&
> > ./tools/dtoc/dtoc -t && make testconfig; fi; fi
> > cp: cannot create regular file
> > '/home/travis/build/rickchen36/sandbox/': Not a directory
> > cp: cannot create regular file
> > '/home/travis/build/rickchen36/sandbox/': Not a directory
> > WARNING: no status info for 'sipeed_maix_bitm'
> > WARNING: no maintainers for 'sipeed_maix_bitm'
>
> I'm not sure what the issue here is. Which specific files are lacking a
> MAINTAINERS entry?
>
> >
> > So I will drop your patchs and run CI again today.
> > And hope you can fix them in next version and pass CI verification.
>
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rick
> >
>
> These "errors" seem rather minor. I will fix the PLIC ones in the next
> revision, but I don't think the sort found in this email are
> particularly erroneous.


Can you run and pass Travis CI after you fix your patchs
It help us to maintain the quality about patch works.

Thanks,
Rick

>
> --Sean
>