[PATCH v7 0/9] dm: Add programmatic generation of ACPI tables (part A)
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 07:58:00 CEST 2020
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:58 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:46 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:37 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Andy,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 11:43, Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 02:36:48PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > This is split from the original series in an attempt to get things applied
> > > > > in chunks.
> > > > >
> > > > > v7 is just a rebase as requested
> > > >
> > > > So, overall I have no concerns, except that compatible string in ACPI seems
> > > > half-baked solution and, due to PRP0001 awareness (my understanding that it
> > > > should not be part of production devices), seems not needed right now.
> > > > It means we should require to have _HID and/or _CID.
> > >
> > > OK I am really not sure what to say about this. Let's deal with it
> > > when we see the use of it later.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Code looks fine to me, though.
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK good. I will send part B soon.
> > >
> >
> > v7 has been applied to u-boot-x86, thanks!
> >
>
> Unfortunately this series breaks sandbox_spl, please take a look.
>
> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-x86/-/jobs/81615
>
Did you send out a fix for this series so that I can squash in?
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list