[PATCH 1/8] x86: Add a new X86_RUN_64BIT_ONLY to Kconfig

[Bin Meng]

Hi Aiden,

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 1:44 PM Park, Aiden <aiden.park at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 1:16 PM
> > To: Park, Aiden <aiden.park at intel.com>
> > Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>; U-Boot Mailing List <u-
> > boot at lists.denx.de>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] x86: Add a new X86_RUN_64BIT_ONLY to Kconfig
> >
> > Hi Aiden,
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 18:45, <aiden.park at intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Aiden Park <aiden.park at intel.com>
> > >
> > > This will build U-Boot as a pure 64-bit binary with no SPL.
> > > It can be used with a pre-stage boot firmware which has already done
> > > 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit init.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Aiden Park <aiden.park at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index
> > > c8eae24c07..89add17e69 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -40,6 +40,14 @@ config X86_RUN_64BIT
> > >           runs through the 16-bit and 32-bit init, then switches to 64-bit
> > >           mode and jumps to U-Boot proper.
> > >
> > > +config X86_RUN_64BIT_ONLY
> >
> > Perhaps X86_RUN_64BIT_NO_SPL? Bin might hav a better idea.
> >
> I considered X64_RUN_64BIT_NO_SPL, X64_RUN_64BIT_PURE and X64_RUN_64BIT_NATIVE.
> Hi Bin, can you recommend better naming?

Cannot figure out a better name :) Let's use it.

Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>

Regards,
Bin