[PATCH v2] dm: uclass: don't assign aliased seq numbers
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Sun Feb 2 23:50:12 CET 2020
Hi Michael,
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 19:16, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 06:29, Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc> wrote:
> >
> > If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically"
> > allocated numbers next to the highest alias.
> >
> > Please note, that this might lead to holes in the sequences, depending
> > on the device tree. For example if there is only an alias "ethernet1",
> > the next device seq number would be 2.
> >
> > In particular this fixes a problem with boards which are using ethernet
> > aliases but also might have network add-in cards like the E1000. If the
> > board is started with the add-in card and depending on the order of the
> > drivers, the E1000 might occupy the first ethernet device and mess up
> > all the hardware addresses, because the devices are now shifted by one.
> >
> > Cc: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim at fitzsim.org>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc>
> > Reviewed-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean at nxp.com>
> > Tested-by: Alex Marginean <alexandru.marginean at nxp.com>
> > Acked-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > As a side effect, this should also make the following commits
> > superfluous:
> > - 7f3289bf6d ("dm: device: Request next sequence number")
> > - 61607225d1 ("i2c: Fill req_seq in i2c_post_bind()")
> > Although I don't understand the root cause of the said problem.
> >
> > Thomas, Michal, could you please test this and then I'd add a second
> > patch removing the old code.
>
> I think this is reasonable. We have discussed a possible rework of the
> logic to merge seq and req_seq, but I don't think we have any patches
> yet.
>
> Please can you add a test to your patch? You can put it in test-fdt.c
> for example.
>
> If you are reverting the other patches, could you please send patches for those?
One more thing...this actually breaks existing tests so please fix those also.
Thanks,
SImon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list