[PATCH 0/5] x86: Improve support for chain-loading U-Boot
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Feb 3 14:36:51 CET 2020
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 05:30, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 1:02 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 1:00 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2019 at 6:13 PM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This little series adds a few checks into the code to allow better
> > > > operation when booting a build from a previous-state loader such as
> > > > coreboot.
> > > >
> > > > At present we have a 'coreboot' target, but sometimes it is useful to boot
> > > > a bare-metal target, such as coral, from coreboot. That allows comparison
> > > > of operation between the bare metal version doing all the init itself and
> > > > relying on coreboot for some init.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for sharing. May I ask what devices and configurations you
> > > have tested this on?
> > >
> > > P.S. I'll be able to test my case after xmas vacations (mid January).
> > >
> >
> > Do you have any review comments to share?
>
> Not for time being. Sorry, I'm busy with something else, but if there
> is a branch with these patches available thru x86 U-Boot tree, it will
> be easier to me to have a chance to test.
This one is u-boot-dm/cor3chain-working
I always push to the -dm tree before sending patches out, but don't
always mention it in the cover letter!
The ACPI patches are at dm/coral-working
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list