[PATCH] net: phy: dp83867: Do not check sgmii if rgmii is already used
Michal Simek
michal.simek at xilinx.com
Tue Feb 11 09:11:44 CET 2020
On 10. 02. 20 13:07, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 07/02/2020 13:31, Michal Simek wrote:
>> There is no reason to check sgmii branch again when it is clear that phy
>> interface is rgmii.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Â drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c | 4 +---
>> Â 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c b/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c
>> index 4d796e289c45..3178787ff1c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/dp83867.c
>> @@ -327,9 +327,7 @@ static int dp83867_config(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â phy_write_mmd(phydev, DP83867_DEVADDR,
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â DP83867_RGMIIDCTL, delay);
>> -Â Â Â }
>> -
>> -Â Â Â if (phy_interface_is_sgmii(phydev)) {
>> +Â Â Â } else if (phy_interface_is_sgmii(phydev)) {
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â phy_write(phydev, MDIO_DEVAD_NONE, MII_BMCR,
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â (BMCR_ANENABLE | BMCR_FULLDPLX | BMCR_SPEED1000));
>> Â
>
> From one side I have no objections, but from another - I'd prefer to
> keep as is.
Can you please be elaborate on this one more?
Thanks,
Michal
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list