[PATCH v2 11/21] arm: socfpga: Secure register access for clock manager (SoC 64bits)
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Wed Feb 19 18:21:38 CET 2020
On 2/19/20 1:25 PM, chee.hong.ang at intel.com wrote:
> From: Chee Hong Ang <chee.hong.ang at intel.com>
>
> Allow clock manager driver to access the System Manager's Boot
> Scratch Register 0 in non-secure mode (EL2) on SoC 64bits platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang <chee.hong.ang at intel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_agilex.c | 5 +++--
> arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_s10.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_agilex.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_agilex.c
> index 4ee2b7b..e5a0998 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_agilex.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_agilex.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <asm/arch/system_manager.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/clock/agilex-clock.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/secure_reg_helper.h>
>
> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>
> @@ -65,8 +66,8 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sys_free_clk_hz(void)
>
> u32 cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
> {
> - return readl(socfpga_get_sysmgr_addr() +
> - SYSMGR_SOC64_BOOT_SCRATCH_COLD0);
> + return socfpga_secure_reg_read32(socfpga_get_sysmgr_addr() +
> + SYSMGR_SOC64_BOOT_SCRATCH_COLD0);
> }
>
> void cm_print_clock_quick_summary(void)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_s10.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_s10.c
> index 05e4212..02578cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_s10.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/clock_manager_s10.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include <asm/arch/clock_manager.h>
> #include <asm/arch/handoff_s10.h>
> #include <asm/arch/system_manager.h>
> +#include <asm/arch/secure_reg_helper.h>
>
> DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>
> @@ -385,8 +386,8 @@ unsigned int cm_get_l4_sp_clk_hz(void)
>
> unsigned int cm_get_qspi_controller_clk_hz(void)
> {
> - return readl(socfpga_get_sysmgr_addr() +
> - SYSMGR_SOC64_BOOT_SCRATCH_COLD0);
> + return socfpga_secure_reg_read32(socfpga_get_sysmgr_addr() +
> + SYSMGR_SOC64_BOOT_SCRATCH_COLD0);
> }
>
> unsigned int cm_get_spi_controller_clk_hz(void)
Shouldn't the IO accessors already provide the necessary abstraction ?
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list