[PATCH 3/4 v5] watchdog: mpc8xx_wdt: Watchdog driver and macros cleanup
Stefan Roese
sr at denx.de
Thu Feb 20 06:37:56 CET 2020
Hi Christophe,
On 19.02.20 20:15, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On 04/25/2019 07:17 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
>> With the generic watchdog driver now implemented, this patch removes
>> some legacy stuff from the MPC8xx watchdog driver and its Kconfig
>> integration. CONFIG_MPC8xx_WATCHDOG is completely removed and
>> hw_watchdog_reset() is made static, as the watchdog will now get
>> serviced via the DM infrastructure if enabled via CONFIG_WATCHDOG.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
>> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr>
>> ---
>> v5:
>> - No change
>>
>> v4:
>> - New patch
>>
>> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +-
>> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/Kconfig | 6 +++---
>> drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 1 -
>> drivers/watchdog/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/watchdog/mpc8xx_wdt.c | 4 +---
>> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> index c727d9162c..0b1629ba62 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ config MPC8xx
>> bool "MPC8xx"
>> select BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
>> imply CMD_REGINFO
>> - imply MPC8xx_WATCHDOG
>> + imply WDT_MPC8xx
>> endchoice
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/Kconfig
>> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/Kconfig
>> index b0e90a0f20..3e8ea38529 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/Kconfig
>> @@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ config MPC885
>> endchoice
>> -config MPC8xx_WATCHDOG
>> - bool "Watchdog"
>> - select HW_WATCHDOG
>> +#config MPC8xx_WATCHDOG
>> +# bool "Watchdog"
>> +# select HW_WATCHDOG
>
> If HW_WATCHDOG is not selected, we have a problem in cpu_init_f()
> (arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/cpu_init.c) with the following line, and the
> board with restart every second.
>
> #ifndef CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG
> /* deactivate watchdog if not enabled in config */
> out_be32(&immr->im_siu_conf.sc_sypcr, CONFIG_SYS_SYPCR & ~SYPCR_SWE);
> #endif
>
> Should this be changed to use CONFIG_WATCHDOG instead ?
Yes, that sound reasonable.
Thanks,
Stefan
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list