[PATCH 10/10] arm: mvebu: clearfog: don't assume MMC booting

Baruch Siach baruch at tkos.co.il
Mon Jan 13 12:40:23 CET 2020


Hi Stefan,

On Mon, Jan 13 2020, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 12.01.20 17:34, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 12 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>> On 2020-01-12 03:49, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Jan 11 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
>>>>> +config SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR
>>>>> +	hex "Address on the MMC to load U-Boot from"
>>>>> +	default 0x141
>>>>> +	depends on MVEBU_SPL_BOOT_DEVICE_MMC
>>>>
>>>> You might want to take a look at the series linked below, which
>>>> conflicts with this patch:
>>>>
>>>>    https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=121894
>>>
>>> Indeed, the dynamic runtime approach seems much nicer for handling the MMCSD
>>> offset business, including relative vs. absolute device offset. I only have
>>> non-eMMC units so can't test it, but I'm all for dropping the
>>> SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR portion of this patch in favor of that patch,
>>> in which leaving the defconfig entry does no harm. Any indication of when that
>>> patch will be included? It seems to have been stagnant for a while.
>>
>> Indeed. I'm waiting patiently.
>
> I have missed addressing this patch series for quite some time, sorry.
> Could you please rebase this patchset on top of current mainline as it
> doesn't apply any more. And please do a compile run for all targets as
> well (Travis). I'll try to push it upstream in this merge window.

Thanks. I'll work on that tomorrow.

While you are at it can you also push this fix:

  https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1205597/

Clearfog can't boot v2020.01 clearfog_defconfig without it :-(.

Thanks,
baruch

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -


More information about the U-Boot mailing list