[PATCH v3 02/10] arm: k3: Add support for loading non linux remote cores
keerthy
j-keerthy at ti.com
Wed Jan 22 02:10:41 CET 2020
On 1/21/2020 6:26 PM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 1/21/20 6:07 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>> Add MAIN domain R5FSS0 remoteproc support from spl. This enables
>> loading the elf firmware in SPL and starting the remotecore.
>>
>> In order to start the core, there should be a file with path
>> "/lib/firmware/j7-main-r5f0_0-fw" under filesystem
>> of respective boot mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla at ti.com>
>> [Guard start_non_linux_remote_cores under CONFIG_FS_LOADER]
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg <dannenberg at ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> arch/arm/mach-k3/common.h | 2 +
>> arch/arm/mach-k3/j721e_init.c | 34 ++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c
>> index 8d1529062d..f0ac0c39f1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,10 @@
>> #include <asm/arch/sys_proto.h>
>> #include <asm/hardware.h>
>> #include <asm/io.h>
>> +#include <fs_loader.h>
>> +#include <fs.h>
>> +#include <env.h>
>> +#include <elf.h>
>>
>> struct ti_sci_handle *get_ti_sci_handle(void)
>> {
>> @@ -57,6 +61,74 @@ int early_console_init(void)
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_K3_SPL_ATF
>> +
>> +void init_env(void)
>> +{
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_ENV_SUPPORT
>> + char *part;
>> +
>> + env_init();
>> + env_load();
>> + switch (spl_boot_device()) {
>> + case BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2:
>> + part = env_get("bootpart");
>> + env_set("storage_interface", "mmc");
>> + env_set("fw_dev_part", part);
>> + break;
>> + case BOOT_DEVICE_SPI:
>> + env_set("storage_interface", "ubi");
>> + env_set("fw_ubi_mtdpart", "UBI");
>> + env_set("fw_ubi_volume", "UBI0");
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + printf("%s from device %u not supported!\n",
>> + __func__, spl_boot_device());
>
>
> This will print for almost every boot mode..
I can keep this under debug.
>
>
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_FS_LOADER
>> +int load_firmware(char *name_fw, char *name_loadaddr, u32 *loadaddr)
>> +{
>> + struct udevice *fsdev;
>> + char *name = NULL;
>> + int size = 0;
>> +
>> + *loadaddr = 0;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_ENV_SUPPORT
>> + switch (spl_boot_device()) {
>> + case BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2:
>> + name = env_get(name_fw);
>> + *loadaddr = env_get_hex(name_loadaddr, *loadaddr);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + printf("Loading rproc fw image from device %u not supported!\n",
>> + spl_boot_device());
>
>
> This whole thing seems very MMC specific, if early firmware loading is
> important it should work for all boot modes. Find a way to include it in
> the next boot stage FIT image (tispl.bin) so it works for all modes.
That was not NAKd. We are going with fs_loader approach.
>
>
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +#endif
>> + if (!*loadaddr)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (!uclass_get_device(UCLASS_FS_FIRMWARE_LOADER, 0, &fsdev)) {
>> + size = request_firmware_into_buf(fsdev, name, (void *)*loadaddr,
>> + 0, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return size;
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +int load_firmware(char *name_fw, char *name_loadaddr, u32 *loadaddr)
>> +{
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +__weak void start_non_linux_remote_cores(void)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> void __noreturn jump_to_image_no_args(struct spl_image_info *spl_image)
>> {
>> struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci = get_ti_sci_handle();
>> @@ -65,15 +137,17 @@ void __noreturn jump_to_image_no_args(struct spl_image_info *spl_image)
>> /* Release all the exclusive devices held by SPL before starting ATF */
>> ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.release_exclusive_devices(ti_sci);
>>
>> + ret = rproc_init();
>> + if (ret)
>> + panic("rproc failed to be initialized (%d)\n", ret);
>> +
>> + init_env();
>> + start_non_linux_remote_cores();
>> +
>> /*
>> * It is assumed that remoteproc device 1 is the corresponding
>> * Cortex-A core which runs ATF. Make sure DT reflects the same.
>> */
>> - ret = rproc_dev_init(1);
>> - if (ret)
>> - panic("%s: ATF failed to initialize on rproc (%d)\n", __func__,
>> - ret);
>> -
>
>
> Where did this code go?
rproc_init takes care of that.
>
>
>> ret = rproc_load(1, spl_image->entry_point, 0x200);
>> if (ret)
>> panic("%s: ATF failed to load on rproc (%d)\n", __func__, ret);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.h
>> index d8b34fe060..42fb8ee6e7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/common.h
>> @@ -24,3 +24,5 @@ void setup_k3_mpu_regions(void);
>> int early_console_init(void);
>> void disable_linefill_optimization(void);
>> void remove_fwl_configs(struct fwl_data *fwl_data, size_t fwl_data_size);
>> +void start_non_linux_remote_cores(void);
>> +int load_firmware(char *name_fw, char *name_loadaddr, u32 *loadaddr);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/j721e_init.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/j721e_init.c
>> index f7f7398081..c5f8ede1a0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/j721e_init.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/j721e_init.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>> #include <dm.h>
>> #include <dm/uclass-internal.h>
>> #include <dm/pinctrl.h>
>> +#include <remoteproc.h>
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>> #ifdef CONFIG_K3_LOAD_SYSFW
>> @@ -295,3 +296,36 @@ void release_resources_for_core_shutdown(void)
>> }
>> }
>> #endif
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_K3_SPL_ATF
>> +void start_non_linux_remote_cores(void)
>> +{
>> + int size = 0, ret;
>> + u32 loadaddr = 0;
>> +
>> + size = load_firmware("mainr5f0_0fwname", "mainr5f0_0loadaddr",
>> + &loadaddr);
>> + if (size <= 0)
>> + goto err_load;
>> +
>> + /* remoteproc 2 is aliased for the needed remotecore */
>
>
> Assuming the big-arm core to boot is remoteproc 1 was reasonable, but
> there needs to be a better what than assuming the number for every other
> remote core.
>
>
>> + ret = rproc_load(2, loadaddr, size);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + printf("Firmware failed to start on rproc (%d)\n", ret);
>> + goto err_load;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = rproc_start(2);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + printf("Firmware init failed on rproc (%d)\n", ret);
>> + goto err_load;
>> + }
>> +
>> + printf("Remoteproc 2 started successfully\n");
>
>
> That's useful..
That is a print that tells everything went well with rproc 2. Otherwise
one has to really find other ways to see if it succeeded or not.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>> +
>> + return;
>> +
>> +err_load:
>> + rproc_reset(2);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list