[PATCH 10/10] setexpr: Add support for strings

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Simon.

In message <CAPnjgZ3DmeaincEcYkjeTuRijqtMZhJiDnyx_o4eSRE4gJaVFw at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> > > setexpr c *10 + *100
> >
> > I don't get it.  The equivalent to "${a}${b}" would be
> >
> >         setexpr c "*10*100"
> >
> > which is even simpler?
>
> I don't see how that works. The *10 thing in my example reads a string
> out of address 10.

Ah, got it.  This requires your "[PATCH 10/10] setexpr: Add support
for strings" first...

But then... should there not be some '.s' size specification
somewhere?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"Unix is simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity."
					             - Dennis Ritchie