[PATCH v2 0/3] allow positional arguments with "run"

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Fri Nov 6 21:52:45 CET 2020


On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:25:31AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 07/10/2020 09.20, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This enables one to use positional arguments $1..$9 in functions
> > defined in the environment, 
> 
> Tom, can I ask for a decision on these? I know Wolfgang is opposed, and
> if that counts as a veto, fine, I'd just like to know so these are at
> least not kept hanging indefinitely.

Sorry for the lack of feedback.  I guess, I just don't know.  There's at
least two series now (this and Simon's setexp) where part of the
feedback has been "our hush is ancient, and we should replace and keep
it in sync, and add features _upstream_".  That position isn't wrong.
But it's not easy to do, either.  I know you already said you didn't
have time and wouldn't step up to do that.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20201106/e3f63e02/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list