[PATCH 10/10] setexpr: Add support for strings

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 13:58, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:27:25AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 09:30, Marek Behun <marek.behun at nic.cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:12:17 -0700
> > > Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Marek,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 1 Nov 2020 at 16:08, Marek Behun <marek.behun at nic.cz> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the purpose of + operator on strings?
> > > > > Can't we use setenv "${a}${b}" ?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that does the same thing, although it is a bit clumsy.
> > > >
> > > > setenv a *10
> > > > setenv b *100
> > > > setenv c "${a}${b}"
> > > >
> > > > instead of
> > > >
> > > > setexpr c *10 + *100
> > >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > I don't know. It provides the same functionality that exists, but only
> > > adds code.
> > > Is someone really going to use this?
> >
> > I don't know. Perhaps we can wait and see if anyone cares?
>
> Sorry, does that mean this support is just speculative?  Or did I
> misread this part of the thread?  Thanks.

I think it was a misunderstanding of what it does. Marek acked the
patch and Wolfgang seems happy.

Regards,
SImon