[RESEND PATCH] fdt: Use phandle to distinguish DT nodes with same name
Vignesh Raghavendra
vigneshr at ti.com
Wed Nov 18 17:55:19 CET 2020
On 11/18/20 8:44 PM, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 18/11/20 8:07 pm, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Aswath,
>>
>> On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 07:29, Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju at ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> While assigning the sequence number to subsystem instances by reading the
>>> aliases property, only DT nodes names are compared and not the complete
>>> path. This causes a problem when there are two DT nodes with same name but
>>> have different paths.
>>>
>>> Fix it by comparing the phandles of DT nodes after the node names match.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Resending this patch as it was held awaiting for moderator approval because
>>> patch was sent by non-member.
>>>
>>> lib/fdtdec.c | 5 +++++
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/fdtdec.c b/lib/fdtdec.c
>>> index 2015907dee7d..9e1bfe0b519e 100644
>>> --- a/lib/fdtdec.c
>>> +++ b/lib/fdtdec.c
>>> @@ -478,6 +478,11 @@ int fdtdec_get_alias_seq(const void *blob, const char *base, int offset,
>>> slash = strrchr(prop, '/');
>>> if (strcmp(slash + 1, find_name))
>>> continue;
>>> +
>>> + if (fdt_get_phandle(blob, offset) !=
>>> + fdt_get_phandle(blob, fdt_path_offset(blob, prop)))
>>> + continue;
>>
>> The call to fdt_path_offset() is very slow. Perhaps we can do this
>> check only with livetree? What situation is causing a problem for you?
>> What are the node / alias names?
>
> In the case of live tree for getting the sequence number the node
> pointers are compared. So, I don't think this problem would come up.
>
> As for the use case,
>
> In AM654 Device tree there are two instances of USB controllers and both
> the controller nodes have the same name usb at 10000
>
> If dfu is performed through the port connected to second controller.
> Then based on the dr_mode of first controller the instance number to be
> used in dfu command will vary. In order to make the instance number for
> dfu command to be independent, aliases can be used(If aliases are
> defined then the sequence number is assigned as the alias number.).
>
> The problem with current method for acquiring sequence number using
> aliases is that only the name of the node is compared with node name
> from the aliases property. So in the above case both the controllers
> will have the same name. This leads to the first alias number being used
> for the both the controllers to assign sequence number.
>
>
> aliases {
> serial2 = &main_uart0;
> ethernet0 = &cpsw_port1;
> usb0 = &usb0; // This property being used to
> //alias both the controllers
> usb1 = &usb1;
> };
To explain a bit more, here is the DT snippet around usb0 and usb1
dwc3_0: dwc3 at 4000000 {
compatible = "ti,am654-dwc3";
reg = <0x0 0x4000000 0x0 0x4000>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x4000000 0x20000>;
...
usb0: usb at 10000 {
compatible = "snps,dwc3";
reg = <0x10000 0x10000>;
...
};
};
dwc3_1: dwc3 at 4020000 {
compatible = "ti,am654-dwc3";
reg = <0x0 0x4020000 0x0 0x4000>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x4020000 0x20000>;
...
usb1: usb at 10000 {
compatible = "snps,dwc3";
reg = <0x10000 0x10000>;
...
};
};
In above case, (with CONFIG_OF_LIVE disabled),
fdtdec_get_alias_seq() fails to pick the correct instance for USB
controller for a given index. This is because fdtdec_get_alias_seq()
only compares the leaf node name (usb at 10000) with alias path and thus
both usb instances match to usb0.
>
> So, to distinguish nodes with same name, phandles can be used while
> assigning sequence numbers.
>
> Thanks,
> Aswath
>
>>
>>> +
>>> val = trailing_strtol(name);
>>> if (val != -1) {
>>> *seqp = val;
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list