[PATCH v2 0/9] spl: atf: add support for LOAD_IMAGE_V2

Michael Walle michael at walle.cc
Fri Nov 20 11:48:27 CET 2020


Am 2020-11-20 11:14, schrieb Michal Simek:
> Hi,
> 
> On 18. 11. 20 17:45, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Newer TF-A versions provide a new image loading protocol. This is used 
>> on
>> (newer?) NXP's SoCs. Normally, the bootflow is bl1 -> bl2 -> bl31 ->
>> u-boot. With this series it is possible that U-Boot SPL loads the bl31
>> directly and thus replacing bl1 and bl2 from the TF-A.
>> 
>> This was tested on the Kontron sl28 board using NXPs bl31 and the 
>> upstream
>> version of the OP-TEE Trusted OS.
> 
> I still have some questions about this.
> 
> As I see from TFA previous image format has been removed in 2018 by
> 
> commit ed51b51f7a9163a7fc48289c5ed97a3fe4fe504f
> Author:     Roberto Vargas <roberto.vargas at arm.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon Sep 24 17:20:48 2018 +0100
> Commit:     Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz at arm.com>
> CommitDate: Fri Sep 28 15:31:52 2018 +0100
> 
>     Remove build option LOAD_IMAGE_V2
> 
>     The code of LOAD_IMAGE_V2=0 has been removed.
> 
>     Change-Id: Iea03e5bebb90c66889bdb23f85c07d0c9717fffe
>     Co-authored-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz at arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz at arm.com>
> 
> 

DOH! Lol, I'm using just one non-upstream part for the whole board
and of course it is doing something miserable. I wasn't aware of this.

> On Xilinx ZynqMP I use SPL->bl31 loading but not using that TFA
> structure because xilinx is using own format.
> 
> But I am curious if V2 was removed in 2018 who is really using previous
> one and also if current implemenation is origin or also not full v2.

NXP,
https://source.codeaurora.org/external/qoriq/qoriq-components/atf/tree/plat/nxp/common/common.mk#n55

The last non-nxp commit there was from around March 2018..

> And these patches are not breaking boot on zynqmp that's why not big
> deal for me.

I was looking at porting TFA to upstream for this board but there is
such a huge gap. Therefore, it seemed to be easier to just use the
vendor version for now.

-michael


More information about the U-Boot mailing list