[RFC v2 00/20] efi_loader: more tightly integrate UEFI disks to driver model
AKASHI Takahiro
takahiro.akashi at linaro.org
Fri Dec 10 07:49:27 CET 2021
# This is a kind of snapshot of my current work.
# I submit this to show my progress on this effort, and then
# I haven't addressed all the issues in this version.
# See the change history below.
The purpose of this RPC is to reignite the discussion about how UEFI
subystem would best be integrated into U-Boot driver model.
In the past, I poposed a couple of patch series, the latest one[1],
while Heinrich revealed his idea[2], and the approach taken here is
something between them, with a focus on block device handlings.
# The code is a PoC and not well tested yet.
Disks in UEFI world:
====================
In general in UEFI world, accessing to any device is performed through
a 'protocol' interface which are installed to (or associated with) the device's
UEFI handle (or an opaque pointer to UEFI object data). Protocols are
implemented by either the UEFI system itself or UEFI drivers.
For block IO's, it is a device which has EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL (efi_disk
hereafter). Currently, every efi_disk may have one of two origins:
a.U-Boot's block devices or related partitions
(lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c)
b.UEFI objects which are implemented as a block device by UEFI drivers.
(lib/efi_driver/efi_block_device.c)
All the efi_diskss as (a) will be enumelated and created only once at UEFI
subsystem initialization (efi_disk_register()), which is triggered by
first executing one of UEFI-related U-Boot commands, like "bootefi",
"setenv -e" or "efidebug".
EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL is implemented by UEFI system using blk_desc(->ops)
in the corresponding udevice(UCLASS_BLK).
On the other hand, efi_disk as (b) will be created each time UEFI boot
services' connect_controller() is executed in UEFI app which, as a (device)
controller, gives the method to access the device's data,
ie. EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL.
>>> more details >>>
Internally, connect_controller() search for UEFI driver that can support
this controller/protocol, 'efi_block' driver(UCLASS_EFI) in this case,
then calls the driver's 'bind' interface, which eventually installs
the controller's EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL to efi_disk object.
'efi_block' driver also create a corresponding udevice(UCLASS_BLK) for
* creating additional partitions efi_disk's, and
* supporting a file system (EFI_SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOCOL) on it.
<<< <<<
Issues:
=======
1. While an efi_disk represents a device equally for either a whole disk
or a partition in UEFI world, the driver model treats only a whole
disk as a real block device or udevice(UCLASS_BLK).
2. efi_disk holds and makes use of "blk_desc" data even though blk_desc
in plat_data is supposed to be private and not to be accessed outside
the driver model.
# This issue, though, exists for all the implmenetation of U-Boot
# file systems as well.
For efi_disk(a),
3. A block device can be enumelated dynamically by 'scanning' a device bus
in U-Boot, but UEFI subsystem is not able to update efi_disks accordingly.
For examples,
=> scsi rescan; efidebug devices
=> usb start; efidebug devices ... (A)
(A) doesn't show any usb devices detected.
=> scsi rescan; efidebug boot add -b 0 TEST scsi 0:1 ...
=> scsi rescan ... (B)
=> bootefi bootmgr ... (C)
(C) may de-reference a bogus blk_desc pointer which has been freed by (B).
(Please note that "scsi rescan" removes all udevices/blk_desc and then
re-create them even if nothing is changed on a bus.)
For efi_disk(b),
4. A "controller (handle)", combined with efi_block driver, has no
corresponding udevice as a parent of efi_disks in DM tree, unlike,
say, a scsi controller, even though it provides methods for block io
operations.
5. There is no way supported to remove efi_disk's even after
disconnect_controller() is called.
My approach in this RFC:
========================
Due to functional differences in semantics, it would be difficult
to identify "udevice" structure as a handle in UEFI world. Instead, we will
have to somehow maintain a relationship between a udevice and a handle.
1-1. add a dedicated uclass, UCLASS_PARTITION, for partitions
Currently, the uclass for paritions is not a UCLASS_BLK.
It can be possible to define partitions as UCLASS_BLK
(with IF_TYPE_PARTION?), but
I'm afraid that it may introduce some chaos since udevice(UCLASS_BLK)
is tightly coupled with 'struct blk_desc' data which is still used
as a "structure to a whole disk" in a lot of interfaces.
(I hope that you understand what it means.)
In DM tree, a UCLASS_PARTITON instance has a UCLASS_BLK parent:
For instance,
UCLASS_SCSI --- UCLASS_BLK --- UCLASS_PARTITION
(IF_TYPE_SCSI) |
+- struct blk_desc +- struct disk_part
+- scsi_blk_ops +- blk_part_ops
1-2. create partition udevices in the context of device_probe()
part_init() is already called in blk_post_probe(). See the commit
d0851c893706 ("blk: Call part_init() in the post_probe() method").
Why not enumelate partitions as well in there.
2. add new block access interfaces, which takes a *udevice* as a target
device, in U-Boot and use those functions to implement efi_disk
operations (i.e. EFI_BLOCK_IO_PROTOCOL).
3-1. maintain a bi-directional link between a udevice and an efi_disk
by adding
- a UEFI handle pointer as a tag for a udevice
- a udevice pointer in UEFI handle (in fact, in "struct efi_disk_obj")
3-2. synchronize the lifetime of efi_disk objects in UEFI world with
the driver model using
- event notification associated with device's probe/remove.
4. I have no answer to issue(4) and (5) yet.
Patchs:
=======
For easy understandings, patches may be categorized into seperate groups
of changes.
Patch#1-#10: DM: add device_probe() for later use of events
Patch#11-#12: DM: add new features (tag and event notification)
Patch#13-#16: UEFI: dynamically create/remove efi_disk's for a raw disk
and its partitions
For removal case, we may need more consideration since removing handles
unconditionally may end up breaking integrity of handles
(as some may still be held and referenced to by a UEFI app).
Patch#17-#18: UEFI: use udevice read/write interfaces
Patch#19-#20: UEFI: fix-up efi_driver, aligning with changes in DM integration
[1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-February/357923.html
[2] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-June/452297.html
Change history:
===============
RFCv2 (Dec 10, 2021)
* rebased on 2022-rc3
* re-order and merge some related commits into ones
* call device_probe() in MMC (not bind, but) probe hook (patch#5)
* fix a wrong name of variable (patch#7)
* add patch#9
* invoke device_probe() for virtio devices (patch#10)
* add DM event notitication (from Simon) (patch#11)
* add DM tag support (patch#12)
* move UCLASS_PARTITION driver under disk/ (patch#13)
* create partition's dp using its parent's. This change is necessary
in particular for 'efi_blk' efi_disk (patch#13)
* modify the code so that we will use new features like tags and
event notification (patch#13,15,16,20)
* rename new functions from blk_read/write() to dev_read/write()
(patch#17,18)
* isolate changes in efi_driver from the rest (in efi_loader) (patch#19)
* drop the previous patch#22 ("efi_selftest: block device: adjust dp
for a test") due to the fix in patch#13
RFC (Nov 16, 2021)
* initial RFC
AKASHI Takahiro (19):
part: call part_init() in blk_get_device_by_str() only for MMC
blk: add a helper function, blk_probe_or_unbind()
scsi: call device_probe() after scanning
usb: storage: call device_probe() after scanning
mmc: call device_probe() after scanning
nvme: call device_probe() after scanning
sata: call device_probe() after scanning
block: ide: call device_probe() after scanning
dm: fix an 'undefined' error in some macros
virtio: call device_probe() in scanning
dm: add tag support
dm: disk: add UCLASS_PARTITION
dm: blk: add a device-probe hook for scanning disk partitions
efi_loader: disk: a helper function to create efi_disk objects from
udevice
efi_loader: disk: a helper function to delete efi_disk objects
dm: disk: add read/write interfaces with udevice
efi_loader: disk: use udevice instead of blk_desc
efi_loader: disk: not create BLK device for BLK(IF_TYPE_EFI) devices
efi_driver: align with efi_disk-dm integration
Simon Glass (1):
dm: add event notification
cmd/virtio.c | 21 +-
common/Kconfig | 11 +
common/Makefile | 2 +
common/board_f.c | 2 +
common/event.c | 103 ++++++++++
common/log.c | 1 +
common/usb_storage.c | 4 +
disk/Makefile | 3 +
disk/disk-uclass.c | 249 ++++++++++++++++++++++
disk/part.c | 3 +-
drivers/ata/dwc_ahsata.c | 5 +
drivers/ata/fsl_sata.c | 11 +
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 5 +
drivers/ata/sata_sil.c | 12 ++
drivers/block/blk-uclass.c | 17 ++
drivers/block/ide.c | 4 +
drivers/core/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/core/device-remove.c | 9 +
drivers/core/device.c | 9 +
drivers/core/tag.c | 162 +++++++++++++++
drivers/mmc/mmc-uclass.c | 13 ++
drivers/nvme/nvme.c | 4 +
drivers/scsi/scsi.c | 5 +
include/asm-generic/global_data.h | 3 +
include/blk.h | 12 ++
include/dm/device-internal.h | 10 +
include/dm/device.h | 8 +-
include/dm/tag.h | 76 +++++++
include/dm/uclass-id.h | 1 +
include/efi_loader.h | 4 +-
include/event.h | 105 ++++++++++
include/event_internal.h | 34 +++
include/log.h | 2 +
include/part.h | 18 ++
lib/efi_driver/efi_block_device.c | 34 +--
lib/efi_loader/Kconfig | 2 +
lib/efi_loader/efi_disk.c | 329 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
lib/efi_loader/efi_setup.c | 11 +-
test/common/Makefile | 1 +
test/common/event.c | 87 ++++++++
test/test-main.c | 5 +
41 files changed, 1274 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 common/event.c
create mode 100644 disk/disk-uclass.c
create mode 100644 drivers/core/tag.c
create mode 100644 include/dm/tag.h
create mode 100644 include/event.h
create mode 100644 include/event_internal.h
create mode 100644 test/common/event.c
--
2.33.0
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list