[v2 4/6] arm: socfpga: dts: soc64: Update filename in binman node of FIT image with VAB support

[Simon Glass]

Hi Siew Chin,

On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 07:13, Lim, Elly Siew Chin
<elly.siew.chin.lim at intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 8:37 PM
> > To: Lim, Elly Siew Chin <elly.siew.chin.lim at intel.com>
> > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Marek Vasut
> > <marex at denx.de>; Tan, Ley Foon <ley.foon.tan at intel.com>; See, Chin Liang
> > <chin.liang.see at intel.com>; Simon Goldschmidt
> > <simon.k.r.goldschmidt at gmail.com>; Chee, Tien Fong
> > <tien.fong.chee at intel.com>; Westergreen, Dalon
> > <dalon.westergreen at intel.com>; Gan, Yau Wai <yau.wai.gan at intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [v2 4/6] arm: socfpga: dts: soc64: Update filename in binman node
> > of FIT image with VAB support
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 03:03, Siew Chin Lim <elly.siew.chin.lim at intel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > FIT image of Vendor Authentication Coot (VAB) contains signed images.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Siew Chin Lim <elly.siew.chin.lim at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_soc64_fit-u-boot.dtsi | 22
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> > >
> >
> > I'm not quite sure what is happening here, but consider using two separate files
> > rather than what looks like a patch over an existing one.
> >
>
> There are two boot flow will use binman (socfpga_soc64_fit-u-boot.dtsi) to generate u-boot.fit and kernel.fit:
>     1. socfpga_agilex_atf_defconfig (boot via ATF)
>     2. socfpga_agilex_vab_defconfig (boot via ATF with VAB enabled, support authentication on bl31, u-boot, Linux images)
>
> The binman node settings are the same for both flows. With VAB enabled, all inputs file need to be signed before generate FIT image. We would like to use different input file name to remind user that they need to sign all bl31, u-boot, Linux images when using binman to generate FIT image.
>
> Due to the binman node settings are identical and only the file name need to be different, so we prefer to share the same socfpga_soc64_fit-u-boot.dtsi for both flows.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>

OK I see.

Who does the signing of the inputs? Is that something binman could/should do?

Regards,
Simon