Pull request for UEFI sub-system for efi-2021-04-rc1
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Thu Jan 14 20:24:34 CET 2021
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 07:43:56PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> The following changes since commit ee6726be4f0dccb612f0193c62ca149164c8a5af:
>
> Merge tag 'ti-v2021.04-rc1' of
> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-ti (2021-01-12 09:32:48
> -0500)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi.git
> tags/efi-2021-04-rc1
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 8e70f1cb3f2c18d574b087d4fc1d79e68ce98fa9:
>
> efi_selftest: dtbdump support EFI_DT_FIXUP_PROTOCOL (2021-01-13
> 02:38:01 +0100)
>
> Gitlab showed no problems:
> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi/-/pipelines/5854
>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
But! This got me to look a little harder at things and even if we have
a platform where we disable ext4/fat write support, there's no change in
the EFI side of the code. Is this something we can do anything about?
If so, is it worthwhile or likely to really only change a few boards and
I'm just grasping at straws, so to speak, on the question of "Can we do
anything to reduce EFI code size" ?
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20210114/08d51495/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list