[PATCH v3 1/8] spl: fit: Drop 'length' argument to board_spl_fit_post_load()

Alex G. mr.nuke.me at gmail.com
Mon Jan 18 17:28:45 CET 2021


On 1/15/21 8:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 08:44:05AM -0600, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> 
>> The size is derived from the FIT image itself. Any alignment
>> requirements are machine-specific and known by the board code. Thus
>> the total length can be derived from the FIT image and knowledge of
>> the platform. The 'length' argument is redundant. Remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c | 5 +++--
>>   common/spl/spl_fit.c    | 4 ++--
>>   include/spl.h           | 4 ++--
>>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c
>> index aa2686bb92..11255798d3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/spl.c
>> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>>   #include <asm/mach-imx/hab.h>
>>   #include <asm/mach-imx/boot_mode.h>
>>   #include <g_dnl.h>
>> +#include <linux/libfdt.h>
>>   
>>   DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>   
>> @@ -318,9 +319,9 @@ ulong board_spl_fit_size_align(ulong size)
>>   	return size;
>>   }
>>   
>> -void board_spl_fit_post_load(ulong load_addr, size_t length)
>> +void board_spl_fit_post_load(const void *fit)
>>   {
>> -	u32 offset = length - CONFIG_CSF_SIZE;
>> +	u32 offset = ALIGN(fdt_totalsize(fit), 0x1000);
>>   
>>   	if (imx_hab_authenticate_image(load_addr,
>>   				       offset + IVT_SIZE + CSF_PAD_SIZE,
> 
> OK, this is a problem right here.  First, the code no longer compiles as
> we don't pass in "load_addr", which is what
> imx_hab_authenticate_image() takes to know where in DDR the image is to
> validate.  While I could probably work out that value from what we use
> now for offset, I would rather someone that can test the code do so.
> Thanks!
>

Hi Tom,

I'm sorry I missed that. I seemed to have, again, solved the hard 
problem and choked on something simple. Being able to eliminate the 
'length' argument is essential simplifying the FIT code, and the rest of 
this series. Fixing the compilation issue is trivial, but how do we get 
this tested? Do you know someone with the hardware who'd be willing to 
give it a shot?

Alex


More information about the U-Boot mailing list