Contributor meeting notes 19-Jan-21

[Simon Glass]

Hi Michal,

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 08:50, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/20/21 4:44 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> >
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 00:46, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 1/19/21 7:54 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for attending!
> >>>
> >>> Full notes at [1]
> >>>
> >>> Tuesday 19 January 2021
> >>>
> >>> Present: Daniel Schwierzeck, Heinrich Schuchardt, Michal Simek, Sean
> >>> Anderson, Simon Glass, Walter Lozano
> >>>
> >>> Notes:
> >>> [all] Introductions
> >>> [all] Timing of call
> >>> - Current time is the best across US, Europe, India. But not any good
> >>> for East Asia
> >>> - Simon might send out survey
> >>> - Send invitation to maintainer group - DONE
> >>> [Simon] New sequence numbers
> >>
> >> I can't see any issue with it on zynqmp platform. There is only issue
> >> with i2c which was there for quite a long time that i2c mux is
> >> considered as chip on the subbus as is visible below.
> >
> > Do you mean the naming of the device, or something else? What happens
> > if you type 'i2c bus'?
>
> If look at log below. mux is at address 74 which is i2c_mux_bus_drv
> and when you run i2c dev <any i2c mux channel> and run i2c probe i2c mux
> itself is assigned to to i2c_generic_chip_drv.
> Below you see it multiple times as generic_74 with ID 2/8/12/14/20. All
> of them are just targeting i2c mux.

That's strange. I wonder if it is failing to find it and creating
multiple copies?

+Heiko Schocher too

Regards,
Simon