[RFC 1/1] disk: PARTITIONS should depend on HAVE_BLOCK_DEVICE

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Mon Jan 25 22:02:10 CET 2021


On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 05:28:39PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:

> Partitions are only relevant for block devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
> ---
> I still need to check if the part command is needed on boards
> w/o DISTRO_DEFAULTS.
> ---
>  cmd/Kconfig  | 4 ++--
>  disk/Kconfig | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

So, https://gist.github.com/trini/806edc6d37b0e53931a3b8195cbf9da2 shows
all of the boards that had been building with this now invalid
combination and are discarding a bunch of code.  The next step is to
look at these and see which of them likely have a use case not been
described by these Kconfig choices.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20210125/db592da5/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list