[PATCH] armv8: Handle EL2 Host mode
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Sat Jan 30 14:41:34 CET 2021
On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 13:12:32 +0100
Mark Kettenis <kettenis at openbsd.org> wrote:
> On implementations that support VHE, the layout of the CPTR_EL2
> register depends on whether HCR_EL2.E2H is set. Check this bit
> and and set the aprropriate bits to enable access to the FP/SIMD
> registers. This allows U-Boot to run on systems that pass
> control to U-Boot in EL2 with EL2 Host mode enabled such as
> machine with Apple's M1 SoC.
That looks correct, I compared the bits against the manual.
TCR_EL2 and CNTHCTL_EL2 are also different, have you checked that
U-Boot's usage of it is compatible with E2H=1?
And we should probably allow SVE for non-VHE systems as well, but this
is probably another patch.
One nit below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at openbsd.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S
> index 662449156b..a259717e67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S
> @@ -133,9 +133,15 @@ pie_fixup_done:
> #endif
> b 0f
> 2: set_vbar vbar_el2, x0
> + mrs x0, hcr_el2
> + tbnz x0, #34, el2_host /* HCR_EL2.E2H */
el2_host sounds a bit ambiguous, can we use el2_vhe instead? That would
also point to the term "VHE", which is more known (and searchable)
than the "E2H" bit.
Cheers,
Andre
> mov x0, #0x33ff
> msr cptr_el2, x0 /* Enable FP/SIMD */
> b 0f
> +el2_host:
> + mov x0, #3 << 20
> + msr cptr_el2, x0 /* Enable FP/SIMD */
> + b 0f
> 1: set_vbar vbar_el1, x0
> mov x0, #3 << 20
> msr cpacr_el1, x0 /* Enable FP/SIMD */
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list