[PATCH] configs: add PineTab defconfig

[Icenowy Zheng]

于 2021年3月8日 GMT+08:00 上午8:12:24, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> 写到:
>On Sun, 7 Mar 2021 13:53:56 +0100
>Nicolas Boulenguez <nicolas at debian.org> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>> From: Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris at collabora.com>
>> 
>> The PineTab device-tree is already in u-boot, this commit adds the
>corresponding
>> defconfig, based on pinephone_defconfig.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris at collabora.com>
>> 
>> --- a/board/sunxi/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/board/sunxi/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -471,6 +471,11 @@ M:	Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org>
>>  S:	Maintained
>>  F:	configs/pinephone_defconfig
>>  
>> +PINETAB BOARD
>> +M:	Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris at collabora.com>
>> +S:	Maintained
>> +F:	configs/pinetab_defconfig
>
>Arnaud, do you agree with this?
>Happy to take your patch via Nicolas, but for the maintainer entry I
>would like to have some confirmation.
>
>> +
>>  R16 EVB PARROT BOARD
>>  M:	Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz at free-electrons.com>
>>  S:	Maintained
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/configs/pinetab_defconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
>> +CONFIG_ARM=y
>> +CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y
>> +CONFIG_SPL=y
>> +CONFIG_IDENT_STRING=""
>
>Having "Allwinner Technology" here is indeed weird and probably not
>really justified anymore, given the "support" we see from Allwinner.
>I wonder if we should scrap this for all boards. Also it makes the line
>longer than 80 characters.

But if we do so, it should be in Kconfig, not defconfig.

>
>> +CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I=y
>> +CONFIG_SUNXI_DRAM_LPDDR3_STOCK=y
>> +CONFIG_DRAM_CLK=552
>> +CONFIG_DRAM_ZQ=3881949
>> +CONFIG_MMC_SUNXI_SLOT_EXTRA=2
>> +# CONFIG_VIDEO_DE2 is not set
>> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="sun50i-a64-pinetab"
>> +# CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INIT is not set
>> +CONFIG_BOOTDELAY=0
>
>I answered in the other email about the boot delay already.
>
>So what is the reason for all those other options below?
>Is there any particular reason they were all disabled?
>I can buy CONFIG_NET, but the rest seems unnecessary. There doesn't
>seem to be a driver for the PineTab panel in U-Boot, so this is solely
>suppressing a few lines on the serial? Since this would be surely for
>debug only, I think it's useful to have them, normal users wouldn't see
>them anyway.
>
>> +CONFIG_SYS_CONSOLE_INFO_QUIET=y
>> +# CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is not set
>> +# CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO is not set
>> +# CONFIG_SPL_RAW_IMAGE_SUPPORT is not set
>> +# CONFIG_SPL_BANNER_PRINT is not set
>> +# CONFIG_SPL_POWER_SUPPORT is not set
>> +# CONFIG_NET is not set
>> +# CONFIG_EFI_LOADER is not set
>
>We should definitely keep EFI_LOADER.
>
>Cheers,
>Andre