[PATCH v2 3/9] ARM: stm32: Imply SPL_SPI_LOAD
Patrick DELAUNAY
patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com
Tue Mar 16 14:28:47 CET 2021
On 3/15/21 6:32 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> SPI Load isn't mandatory for STM32 builds.
>
> Let's imply instead of select it to get rid of build
> issues for non-SPI defconfigs.
>
> Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - collect Patrice r-b
>
> arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/Kconfig
> index f538d7cb83..79ffd5191d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/Kconfig
> @@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ config SPL
> select SPL_REGMAP
> select SPL_DM_RESET
> select SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT
> - select SPL_SPI_LOAD
> select SPL_SYSCON
> select SPL_WATCHDOG_SUPPORT if WATCHDOG
> imply BOOTSTAGE_STASH if SPL_BOOTSTAGE
> imply SPL_BOOTSTAGE if BOOTSTAGE
> imply SPL_DISPLAY_PRINT
> imply SPL_LIBDISK_SUPPORT
> + imply SPL_SPI_LOAD
cosmetic: you can add dependency ?
imply SPL_SPI_LOAD if SPL_SPI_SUPPORT
>
> config SYS_SOC
> default "stm32mp"
Anyway
Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com>
Thanks
Patrick
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list