32-bit DMA limit for devices (and drivers)

Bin Meng bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Sat May 1 13:45:02 CEST 2021


On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 7:22 PM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We now see the first Allwinner devices [1] having DRAM located above
> 4GB in address space (4GB DRAM starting at 1GB). After one fix[2]
> this works somewhat fine, but the sun8i-emac network device is still
> limited to 32-bit DMA addresses. With U-Boot relocating itself (plus
> stack and heap) to the end of DRAM, it now runs completely beyond 4GB
> on those machines, so not giving pure 32-bit addresses for buffers
> anymore.
> In Linux we handle this easily by just keeping the default DMA
> mask at 32 bits, and letting the DMA framework deal with the nasty
> details.
>
> I was wondering how this should be handled in U-Boot? The straight
> forward solution would be:
> - Let the driver allocate the RX and TX buffers separately, placing them
>   below 4GB in the address space (using lmb_reserve(), I guess?)
> - Use those RX buffers and hand the addresses back to the upper layers.
> - We already copy TX packets, so this would also be covered, in this
>   situation. Other drivers might need to introduce copying.
>
> This sounds like a common problem, so I was wondering if there is a
> more generic solution to this? Maybe there are already platforms or
> devices affected? Or should the whole heap and stack be moved below 4GB
> (if this is easily possible)?

My understanding is that the relocated address of U-Boot should be
below 4GB then there is no problem for the 32-bit DMA. I thought this
is a rule to be followed by every board, but this is not the case on
your board?

> In our case we make the buffers part of our priv struct, so should
> there be an option to let the priv_auto allocation come from below 4GB?
>
> Grateful for any input on this!

Regards,
Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list