[PATCH] Revert "riscv: cpu: fu740: clear feature disable CSR"

[Green Wan]

As I mentioned before, pcie_dw_common.c is not part of fu740 patch. The
error is actually nothing to do with fu740 patchset. Even I fix those
warning message. It will not be in same patch series.

- Green

Leo Liang <ycliang at andestech.com>於 2021年5月18日 週二，下午8:00寫道：

> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 05:56:08PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> > Hi Green,
> >
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:43 PM Green Wan <green.wan at sifive.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Green,
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:38 PM Leo Liang <ycliang at andestech.com>
> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:45:30AM +0800, Green Wan wrote:
> > >> > > Hi Bin,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks, I'll include that revert. Just traced back the git log.
> My original
> > >> > > patch is based on fu740. I guess it was merged to fu540 since
> fu740 series
> > >> > > wasn't present yet.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi Rick,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Not sure whether you'll pick fu740 series soon or if any parts
> need more
> > >> > > revisement. Do you prefer that I append both this revert and
> "disable CSR"
> > >> > > patch to fu740&unmatched patch series? If so, I will create v9
> patch and
> > >> > > include these 2 patches.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Or if you prefer to keep them separate from fu740 series, we can
> wait for
> > >> > > fu740&unmatche patch merge and I'll create a separate patch for
> this revert
> > >> > > and CSR disable.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > What do you think? Many thanks.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Regards,
> > >> > > - Green
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi Green,
> > >> >
> > >> > Could you please append the "disable CSR" patch to fu740 unmatched
> patch
> > >> > and send a v9 patch ? Thanks!
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> I think you will need some update per this patch as well:
> > >>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210511120412.25065-1-bmeng.cn@gmail.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Bin
> > > I updated the change to [patch v9 1/8]. Thanks,
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hi Leo,
> > >>
> > >> What's your plan for the binman patch series?
> > >>
> > >> If the binman patch series go first, Green needs to update Unmatched
> > >> to use binman as well.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Leo/Bin,
> > >
> > > Are we referring to
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-May/448885.html?
> >
> > This one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=242992
> >
> > > I'd prefer to have a separated patch work to track binman changes.
> Thanks,
> >
> > Actually that's why I asked Leo the plan. If your patch go before my
> > patch, then I will need to do an additional patch to convert
> > unmatched.
> >
> > But if mine go first before yours, you will have to respin another
> > version to do the convert in the first place.
> >
> > Leo, please let us know your plan.
> >
>
> Hi Bin/Green,
>
> I was thinking picking Bin's patch first,
> because Green's patch could not pass CI.
> (Due to some format warning being treated as error
> when compiling drivers/pci/pcie_dw_common.c)
>
> At the meantime, we should come up with some fixes to pass CI.
> Then Green could send his patch with binman,
> or a seperate patch to track binman utility.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> Best regards,
> Leo
>
>
> > Regards,
> > Bin
>