[PATCH u-boot v4 36/36] ARM: enable LTO for some boards

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Fri May 21 16:11:47 CEST 2021


On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 01:56:29PM -0500, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 6:25 AM Marek Behún <marek.behun at nic.cz> wrote:
> >
> > Enable LTO for some boards that were tested by people on U-Boot Mailing
> > List.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <marek.behun at nic.cz>
> > Tested-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org>
> > Tested-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey at gateworks.com>
> 
> Since the imx8mm beacon boards and the imx8mm venice board both show
> promise, does it make sense to 'imply' the LTO for anything enabling
> imx8mm?
> Same thing for the various omap3 boards, and potentially the renesas
> RZ/G2 boards.  I know Tom went through to remove a bunch of boards
> that were never converted to DM.  Most of the boards remaining boards
> have minimal board files and most of code is common to other boards in
> the same platforms.
> 
> I have an l138_lcdk that I can use to test which I expect to be
> similar to the da850evm.

As much as I am eager to move everything, quickly, over to LTO by
default, I think the problems that we've seen thus far show it's best to
really make it an explicit enable per board at least for the first
release or two.  Once we've hopefully gotten more boards tested and
enabled we can see what makes sense for defaults, give a release worth
of heads up, and then go.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20210521/3fa6be72/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list