[PATCH] pinctrl: single: Fix address size reading

[Jan Kiszka]

On 27.05.21 15:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com>
> 
> dev_read_addr_size() is inconsistent in too many ways. In particular,
> it does not retrieve the correct address/size cell number from the DT.
> dev_read_addr_size_index() does the right thing, so use that for now.
> 
> This fixes reading the address size e.g. on boards with the 64-bit
> AM65x where some pinctrl nodes only use 32-bit addresses and sizes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka at siemens.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> index ebb7602dde..2769b7a7fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int single_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	addr = dev_read_addr_size(dev, "reg", &size);
> +	addr = dev_read_addr_size_index(dev, 0, &size);
>  	if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to get base register size\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 

Oops, obsolete, 1e7879045f is doing that already.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux