[PATCH v2 02/41] Makefile: Allow LTO to be disabled for a build

[Tom Rini]

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 05:46:43PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 07:13, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 02:21:17PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/27/21 10:50, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > > > Hi Simon
> > > >
> > > > How does this patch related to the standard boot series? Shouldn't
> > > > this be a completely separate patch?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > /Ilias
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 02:26, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > LTO (Link-Time Optimisation) is an very useful feature which can
> > > > > significantly reduce the size of U-Boot binaries. So far it has been
> > > > > made available for selected ARM boards and sandbox.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, incremental builds are much slower when LTO is used. For example,
> > > > > an incremental build of sandbox takes 2.1 seconds on my machine, but 6.7
> > > > > seconds with LTO enabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add a LTO_BUILD=n parameter to the build, so it can be disabled during
> > > > > development if needed, for faster builds.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add some documentation about LTO while we are here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > (no changes since v1)
> > > > >
> > > > >   Makefile                           | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > > > >   arch/arm/config.mk                 |  4 ++--
> > > > >   arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h |  2 +-
> > > > >   doc/build/gcc.rst                  | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > >   4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > > > > index b79b2319ff6..7057723e046 100644
> > > > > --- a/Makefile
> > > > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > > > @@ -434,6 +434,9 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS       += -fshort-wchar -fno-strict-aliasing
> > > > >   KBUILD_AFLAGS   := -D__ASSEMBLY__
> > > > >   KBUILD_LDFLAGS  :=
> > > > >
> > > > > +# Set this to "n" use of LTO for this build, e.g. LTO_BUILD=n
> > > > > +LTO_BUILD      ?= y
> > >
> > > This does not allow LTO_BUILD=y to enable LTO for CONFIG_LTO=n.
> >
> > I don't understand why we need this patch at all.  If you want to
> > disable LTO, disable LTO.  Yes, LTO makes linking take longer which can
> > be annoying on iterative development.  I have a few different "HACK: DO
> > NOT PUSH:  ..." things I git am at the start of a branch, depending on
> > needs.  You can just do that to drop "imply LTO" from the SANDBOX stanza
> > in arch/Kconfig.  We do not need a whole thing around a CONFIG option
> > that can be disabled in the defconfig, or local .config file even.
> >
> 
> Cranky time.
> 
> Of course we don't *need* it. I could just buy a slower build machine
> and type with two fingers. There are lots of ways to slow things down
> and LTO is one of them. I change branches at least a dozen times a day
> and am always trying things out from patchwork. I am sure others do
> too. LTO dramatically slows down builds. Having a way to easily do
> this from the build system saves time.

Maybe the answer is that LTO just isn't appropriate for sandbox.  We're
not doing any specific tests for LTO anywhere (nor does that seem
appropriate), and we do have platforms in CI that run tests other than
building, with LTO.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20211101/15b2e759/attachment.sig>