[PATCH 0/6] Fix Atmel/Microchip TPMv1.2 issues

[Ilias Apalodimas]

On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 10:42, <Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/4/21 3:12 AM, Mathew McBride wrote:
> > While doing bringup/rebase for the Ten64 I did some troubleshooting
> > for the tpm (v1.2, NOT tpm2) command which did not appear to function,
> > despite the Linux driver and tools (tcsd) working on the same board.
> >
> > Evidently the Atmel TPM driver hasn't kept up with various step
> > changes in the I2C and TPM stacks, and while TPMv1.2 is quite
> > dated to TPMv2 it would be nice to make some use of the hardware
> > that is there.
> > (Admittedly I would love to replace our hardware TPM with an fTPM
> > but that is a project for another day)
> >
> > There are also subcommands in tpm-v1 which also have been
> > missed in changes to the TPMv1 API and are fixed in this patchset.
> >
> > I have checked that this set isn't impacted by Ilias' TPM cleanup
> > series[1] which only touches TPMv2.
> >
> > [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/cover/20211103150910.69732-1-ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org/
> >
> > Mathew McBride (6):
> >    cmd: tpm-v1: fix compile error in TPMv1 list resources command
> >    cmd: tpm-v1: fix load_key_by_sha1 compile errors
> >    drivers: tpm: atmel_twi: drop non-DM_I2C compatibility
> >    drivers: tpm: atmel_twi: do not use an offset byte
> >    drivers: tpm: atmel_twi: implement get_desc operation
> >    drivers: tpm: atmel_twi: fix printf specifier compile warning
> >
> >   cmd/tpm-v1.c                | 17 +++++++++++------
> >   drivers/tpm/tpm_atmel_twi.c | 22 +++++++---------------
> >   lib/tpm-v1.c                |  4 ++--
> >   3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
>
> Hello Mathew, Ilias,
>
> Even if this series touches a Microchip driver/part that is not part of
> the at91 architecture, the patches are in my queue.
> I can take them through at91 tree if this is the way to go.

I am fine with that

> Is there another custodian tree that is dedicated for such kind of
> drivers? or more specific ?

As far as I know there isn't.

>
> Simon, your opinion on this ?
>
> P.S. some of the patches look to be fixes most likely, so I guess it
> would be more likely to have them as fixes for 2022.01 release ?

Yes all of those look good.  I had a minor comment on one of those,
but we can always add more info on the TPM later.

Thanks
/Ilias
>
> Thanks,
> Eugen