[PATCHv2] zynqmp: restore the jtag interface
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
jorge at foundries.io
Wed Oct 13 15:49:16 CEST 2021
On 13/10/21, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
> On 10/13/21 13:40, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> > On 13/10/21, Michal Simek wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/13/21 10:25, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> > > > When boot.bin is configured for secure boot the CSU will disable the
> > > > JTAG interface on all cases.
> > > >
> > > > Some boards might rely on this interface for flashing to QSPI in which
> > > > case those systems might end up bricked during development.
> > > >
> > > > This commit will restore the interface under CSU control
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge at foundries.io>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > I can't see changelog here. What has changed in 3 minutes between v1 and v2?
> >
> > Not in 3 minutes but in 3 months: the first version was submited on
> > 2021-07-16.
> >
> > The first patch sent this morning was missing the "v2" tag hence why I
> > resent three minutes later.
>
> I didn't compare them. Just got two patches. One which looked as v1 and
> second as v2.
>
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2021-October/thread.html
>
>
> >
> > v2 addresses the issues you mentioned with the original patch from
> > July.
> >
> > v2
> > --
> > Macros added to hardware.h
> > Used CONFIG_IS_ENABLED where possible
> > Fixed Kconfig identation
> > Removed unnecessary Kconfig default
> >
> > >
> > > > arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/Kconfig | 8 +++++
> > > > arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/include/mach/hardware.h | 31 +++++++++++++++-----
> > > > board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c | 20 ++++++++++++-
> > > > 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/Kconfig
> > > > index f7b08db355..ee0895d9a2 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -149,6 +149,14 @@ config SPL_ZYNQMP_ALT_BOOTMODE_ENABLED
> > > > Overwrite bootmode selected via boot mode pins to tell SPL what should
> > > > be the next boot device.
> > > > +config SPL_ZYNQMP_RESTORE_JTAG
> > > > + bool "Restore JTAG"
> > > > + depends on SPL
> > > > + help
> > > > + Booting SPL in secure mode causes the CSU to disable the JTAG interface
> > > > + even if no eFuses were burnt. This option restores the interface if
> > > > + possible.
> > > > +
> > > > config ZYNQ_SDHCI_MAX_FREQ
> > > > default 200000000
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/include/mach/hardware.h b/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/include/mach/hardware.h
> > > > index eebf38551c..e6a3ee4a57 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/include/mach/hardware.h
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynqmp/include/mach/hardware.h
> > > > @@ -39,20 +39,26 @@
> > > > #define RESET_REASON_INTERNAL BIT(1)
> > > > #define RESET_REASON_EXTERNAL BIT(0)
> > > > +#define CRLAPB_DBG_LPD_CTRL_SETUP_CLK 0x01002002
> > > > +#define CRLAPB_RST_LPD_DBG_RESET 0
> > > > +
> > > > struct crlapb_regs {
> > > > u32 reserved0[36];
> > > > u32 cpu_r5_ctrl; /* 0x90 */
> > > > - u32 reserved1[37];
> > > > + u32 reserved1[7];
> > > > + u32 dbg_lpd_ctrl; /* 0xB0 */
> > > > + u32 reserved2[29];
> > > > u32 timestamp_ref_ctrl; /* 0x128 */
> > > > - u32 reserved2[53];
> > > > + u32 reserved3[53];
> > > > u32 boot_mode; /* 0x200 */
> > > > - u32 reserved3_0[7];
> > > > + u32 reserved4_0[7];
> > > > u32 reset_reason; /* 0x220 */
> > > > - u32 reserved3_1[6];
> > > > + u32 reserved4_1[6];
> > > > u32 rst_lpd_top; /* 0x23C */
> > > > - u32 reserved4[4];
> > > > + u32 rst_lpd_dbg; /* 0x240 */
> > > > + u32 reserved5[3];
> > > > u32 boot_pin_ctrl; /* 0x250 */
> > > > - u32 reserved5[21];
> > > > + u32 reserved6[21];
> > > > };
> > > > #define crlapb_base ((struct crlapb_regs *)ZYNQMP_CRL_APB_BASEADDR)
> > > > @@ -141,12 +147,23 @@ struct apu_regs {
> > > > #define ZYNQMP_SILICON_VER_MASK 0xF
> > > > #define ZYNQMP_SILICON_VER_SHIFT 0
> > > > +#define CSU_JTAG_SEC_GATE_DISABLE GENMASK(7, 0)
> > > > +#define CSU_JTAG_DAP_ENABLE_DEBUG GENMASK(7, 0)
> > > > +#define CSU_JTAG_CHAIN_WR_SETUP GENMASK(1, 0)
> > > > +#define CSU_PCAP_PROG_RELEASE_PL BIT(0)
> > > > +
> > > > struct csu_regs {
> > > > u32 reserved0[4];
> > > > u32 multi_boot;
> > > > - u32 reserved1[11];
> > > > + u32 reserved1[7];
> > > > + u32 jtag_chain_status_wr;
> > > > + u32 jtag_chain_status;
> > > > + u32 jtag_sec;
> > > > + u32 jtag_dap_cfg;
> > > > u32 idcode;
> > > > u32 version;
> > > > + u32 reserved2[3055];
> > > > + u32 pcap_prog;
> > > > };
> > > > #define csu_base ((struct csu_regs *)ZYNQMP_CSU_BASEADDR)
> > > > diff --git a/board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c b/board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c
> > > > index 000a7cde8d..483f0b9ab2 100644
> > > > --- a/board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c
> > > > +++ b/board/xilinx/zynqmp/zynqmp.c
> > > > @@ -358,6 +358,21 @@ static int multi_boot(void)
> > > > return multiboot;
> > > > }
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
> > > > +static void restore_jtag(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (current_el() != 3)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + writel(CSU_JTAG_SEC_GATE_DISABLE, &csu_base->jtag_sec);
> > > > + writel(CSU_JTAG_DAP_ENABLE_DEBUG, &csu_base->jtag_dap_cfg);
> > > > + writel(CSU_JTAG_CHAIN_WR_SETUP, &csu_base->jtag_chain_status_wr);
> > > > + writel(CRLAPB_DBG_LPD_CTRL_SETUP_CLK, &crlapb_base->dbg_lpd_ctrl);
> > > > + writel(CRLAPB_RST_LPD_DBG_RESET, &crlapb_base->rst_lpd_dbg);
> > > > + writel(CSU_PCAP_PROG_RELEASE_PL, &csu_base->pcap_prog);
> > > > +}
> > > > +#endif
> > > > +
> > > > #define PS_SYSMON_ANALOG_BUS_VAL 0x3210
> > > > #define PS_SYSMON_ANALOG_BUS_REG 0xFFA50914
> > > > @@ -377,11 +392,14 @@ int board_init(void)
> > > > zynqmp_pmufw_load_config_object(zynqmp_pm_cfg_obj,
> > > > zynqmp_pm_cfg_obj_size);
> > > > printf("Silicon version:\t%d\n", zynqmp_get_silicon_version());
> > > > +
> > > > + /* the CSU disables the JTAG interface when secure boot is enabled */
> > > > + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SPL_ZYNQMP_RESTORE_JTAG))
> > > > + restore_jtag();
> > > > #else
> > > > if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_I2C) && CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(I2C_EEPROM))
> > > > xilinx_read_eeprom();
> > > > #endif
> > > > -
> > >
> > > Unrelated.
> >
> > ?
> > checkpatch will fail if we leave two carriage returns
>
> What is the exact issue are you getting?
um, must have been an error on my side.
sent v3 deleting the removal of the unrelated empty line
thanks
>
> M
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list