[PATCH v3 12/16] Layerscape: Add crypto node in device tree

[Michael Walle]

Hi,

> LS(1021/1012/1028/1043/1046/1088/2088), LX2160 - updated device tree
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jain <gaurav.jain at nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>
> ---
> [..]
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> index 50f9b527cd..c2a156ea8e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>  /*
>   * NXP ls1028a SOC common device tree source
>   *
> - * Copyright 2019-2020 NXP
> + * Copyright 2019-2021 NXP

This will be removed again, because its not part of the kernel device tree.

>   *
>   */
>  
> @@ -123,6 +123,45 @@
>  		       0x82000000 0x0 0x40000000 0x88 0x40000000 0x0 0x40000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
>  	};
>  
> +	crypto: crypto at 8000000 {
> +		compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0", "fsl,sec-v4.0";
> +		fsl,sec-era = <10>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges = <0x0 0x00 0x8000000 0x100000>;
> +		reg = <0x00 0x8000000 0x0 0x100000>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 139 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		dma-coherent;
> +
> +		sec_jr0: jr at 10000 {
> +			compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring",
> +				     "fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";
> +			reg	= <0x10000 0x10000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 140 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		};
> +
> +		sec_jr1: jr at 20000 {
> +			compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring",
> +				     "fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";
> +			reg	= <0x20000 0x10000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 141 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		};
> +
> +		sec_jr2: jr at 30000 {
> +			compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring",
> +				     "fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";
> +			reg	= <0x30000 0x10000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 142 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		};
> +
> +		sec_jr3: jr at 40000 {
> +			compatible = "fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring",
> +				     "fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring";
> +			reg	= <0x40000 0x10000>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 143 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +

While this one will collide with my DTB sync series [1]. I'd prefer
to have my series merged first because then this patch will be unnecessary
and I don't have to respin my series (yet again) because there were changes
in the device tree in the meantime.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20211013161427.612033-1-michael@walle.cc/

-michael