[PATCH v4 0/5] board: sl28: target refresh

[Marcel Ziswiler]

Hi Michael

On Sat, 2021-10-23 at 01:28 +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
> 
> Am 2021-10-23 01:09, schrieb Marcel Ziswiler:
> > Sorry, I did not want to upset anybody. I probably should have asked
> > first before doing this.
> 
> You could have said the below in the cover letter. Then
> I'd have at least an idea what is going on ;)
> 
> > On Sat, 2021-10-23 at 00:52 +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Hi Marcel,
> > > 
> > > Am 2021-10-23 00:19, schrieb Marcel Ziswiler:
> > > > From: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler at toradex.com>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Note that this re-base is only compile tested.
> > > 
> > > Care to explain what this is? Why are you taking my patchset
> > > and make a new version of it and rebasing it on the wrong
> > > tree?
> > 
> > You might have noticed that Stefano has a hard time applying some
> > patch sets due to continuing conflicts.
> > Therefore in trying to further the binman clean-up [1] were I am just
> > about to post a new version as well, I
> > took the liberty to re-fresh all the patches my series bases on which
> > have not seen any care for more than a
> > month. I re-based them on top of Stefano's u-boot-imx/master branch
> > which I am very certain is exactly the tree
> > stuff needs to be re-based to, not?
> 
> This is a layerscape SoC board whose patches usually go through
> u-boot-fsl-qoriq. Apart from the one doc fix there should be no
> dependency on the u-boot-imx tree. I just took Frieder's doc fix
> because my last patch depends on it, (in a sense that it doesn't
> apply without it). The imx tree should be fine without the fix,
> it's just that the generated doc is messed up for the kontron
> boards.

Hm, now as you say it I am also wondering a little bit why it slipped into my dependency list. And then, of
course, nobody noticed anything (;-p).

> I think you don't really need this for your series.
> 
> > > Did I miss something?
> > 
> > Not sure. If you still feel my work is of no help to the community I
> > am more than happy to abandon any of it.
> 
> Now knowing why you did it, it's fine; its just the wrong
> tree.

Yep, now I see it. And my re-base does not even make any sense in this case. I guess, your v3 was and is still
just fine for the u-boot-fsl-qoriq/master branch. Let me just cancel this v4 then. I am really sorry and hope I
did not disturb anything.

> -michael

Cheers

Marcel